Channel
@lebiadok
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
1,855subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001424651731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lebiadok |
| Created | 11 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lebiadok |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:50 | 1,855 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,858 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,859 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 1,859 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Вайсковаму аналітыку Ягору Лебядку збіраюцца ўзмацніць пакаранне Нагадаем, суддзя Алена Міснік прызначыла палітвязню 5 гадоў пазбаўлення волі ў калоніі ва ўмовах узмоцненага рэжыму паводле ч. 1 і ч. 2 арт. 361-4 КК (Садзейнічанне экстрэмісцкай дзейнасці). Згодна з матэрыяламі справы, Лебядок «у мэтах забеспячэння дзейнасці публічнага дэструктыўнага канала, інфармацыйную прадукцыя якога суд прызнаў экстрэмісцкімі мат…
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FvYAAnSWAAY-2c0?format=jpg&name=large Крыніца: https://twitter.com/belarus_bw
У «Спіс экстрэмістаў» дадалі яшчэ 41 прозвішча — цяпер у ім 2637 чалавек 31 сакавіка МУС зрабіла традыцыйны пятнічны апдэйт «Пераліка грамадзян Беларусі, замежных грамадзян або асоб без грамадзянства, якія маюць дачыненне да экстрэмісцкай дзейнасці». Акрамя іншых, у спіс дадалі вайсковага аналітыка Ягора Лебядка, былога палітзняволенага намесніка дырэктара Мінскай роварнай супольнасці Максіма Пучынскага, інста-блог…
В Минском областном суде вынесли приговор политзаключенному военному аналитику Егору Лебедку. Его признали виновным по обоим пунктам статьи 361−4 УК о «содействии экстремистской деятельности», в том числе повторно. Судья Алена Мисник приговорила его к пяти годам лишения колонии в условиях усиленного режима. Согласно материалам дела, в апреле и мае 2022 года, Лебедок «в целях обеспечения деятельности общественного де…
Уголовное дело против военного эксперта Егора Лебедка направлено на рассмотрение в Минский областной суд. Его обвиняют в содействии экстремистской деятельности, сообщили в областной прокуратуре. В сообщении пресс-службы ведомства фамилия Лебедка, который назван «40-летним жителем Смолевичского района», не указывается. Основанием для возбуждения дела послужили два интервью на тему российского вторжения в Украину и рол…
Супраць Ягора Лебядка распачалі новую крымінальную справу Праўладныя тэлеграм-каналы паведамілі, што новая справа заведзеная па прыкмеце паўторнасці, і адзначаюць, што кожнае «інтэрв'ю экстрэмістам утварае асобны склад злачынства».
❗️У Беларусі +6 новых палітвязняў Гэта Ягор Лебядок, Дзмітрый Шувалаў, Аляксандр Іваноў, Сяргей Вайцюк, Міхаіл Лістападаў, Сяргей Грыбовіч. Хто гэтыя людзі і чаму праваабарончыя арганізацыі лічаць іх справы палітычна матываванымі 👉 bit.ly/3c3N0s9 Спіс усіх палітвязняў Беларусі 👉 bit.ly/306kkW9
Як сцвярджае канал сілавікоў, прычына — інтэрв'ю Лебядка «Еўрарадыё». Але ёсць нюанс. Яго затрымалі 13 ліпеня. «Еўрарадыё» прызналі экстрэмісцкім фармаваннем пазней — 20 ліпеня. На момант інтэрв'ю СМІ не мела статусу экстрэмістаў.
На военного аналитика Егора Лебедка, вероятно, завели уголовное дело за «содействие экстремистской деятельности». Об этом сообщает связанный с силовиками телеграм-канал «Сводки Центра» со ссылкой на «источники из ГУБОП»
Вайсковы эксперт Ягор Лебядок не выйшаў на волю пасля 15 сутак арышту Нагадаем, яго асудзілі паводле арт. 24.3 КаАП РБ (непадпарадкаванне міліцыянтам).
Военному аналитику Егору Лебедку присудили 15 суток административного ареста по статье 24.3 КоАП — «Неповиновение законному распоряжению или требованию должностного лица при исполнении им служебных полномочий». Процесс проходил в суде Центрального района, постановление выносила судья Виктория Шабуня.
Імя і прозвішча ваеннага эксперта Ягора Лебядка з'явілася 13 ліпеня ў тэлеграм-канале "спісы затрыманых" https://t.me/spiski_okrestina/23605
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lebiadok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 512,729 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | No label recorded on this Wikidata item |
|---|---|
| Official site | http://t.me/lebiadok |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lebiadok” (@lebiadok), 1,855 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lebiadok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.