Channel
@lebaszirelisa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
219subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001095508898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lebaszirelisa |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lebaszirelisa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 219 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 220 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 221 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 221 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🌸سلام دوستای گلم به کانال لباس زیر الیسا خوش امدید🌸 برای ثبت سفارش تصویر مورد نظرتون رو به ایدی من بفرستید 🙂 پرداخت به صورت کارت به کارت میباشد 💳پراخت درب منزل نداریم 💰💸 تحویل سه چهار روزه 📦 هزینه ارسال 15000 t باتشکر☺️ جهت سفارش به ايدي هاي زير مراجعه فرماييد😍 @Soleimani_Sanli @Elisa1393 کانال ارسالی ها 👇 @Elisaaaaa2
Signed ❤️F.M❤️
سوتین نخی بدون فنر 😍 جنس عالی 👌 سایز 80 قیمت 45000❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین راحتی بدون فنر 👌 سایز 100 قیمت 45000 ❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین راحتی بدون فنر 👌 سایز 95 قیمت 45000 ❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین راحتی بدون فنر 👌 سایز 100 قیمت 45000 ❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین نخی چهار خانه رویا 😍 جنس عاااالی 👌 از کیفیت اینکار هرچی بگم کمه😌 سایز 70 تا 85 قیمت 60000❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین نخی چهار خانه رویا 😍 جنس عاااالی 👌 از کیفیت اینکار هرچی بگم کمه😌 سایز 75 و 85 قیمت 60000❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین نخی چهار خانه رویا 😍 جنس عاااالی 👌 از کیفیت اینکار هرچی بگم کمه😌 سایز 70 تا 80 قیمت 60000❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین سایز بزرگ لایه زیر کاملا نخ🤞🏻 سایز نارنجی۹۵ کرم۹۵ سبز۹۰ قیمت 35000 ❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین گیپور😎 داخل نخ🤞🏻 سایز۸۵ قیمت 50000❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین نخی سوزنی 😍 طرحدار 👌 جنس عالی👍 سایز 70 قیمت 45000 ❤️
Signed ELISA
سوتین گیپور😎 فنردار🤞🏻 داخل نخ🤞🏻 سایزبندی زرد تور ۸۰ قیمت 60000 ❤️ صورتی تور ۷۰ قیمت 60000 ❤️ سبزکله غازی گیپور ۷۵ قیمت 70000❤
Signed ELISA
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lebaszirelisa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,201,773 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lebaszirelisa named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لباس زیر الیسا” (@lebaszirelisa), 219 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lebaszirelisa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.