Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 20 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 545–552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 22:18
551
+4
9 Sept 2026, 21:58
547
+1
30 Aug 2026, 13:44
546
no change
30 Aug 2026, 05:45
546
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.12%
avg views ÷ 551 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.3
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
20 (21 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
314
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
1m 56s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
24
80.0%
👍
2
6.67%
😢
2
6.67%
👏
1
3.33%
🥰
1
3.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Adverbs — قیدها در زبان انگلیسی
قید (Adverb) کلمهای است که میتواند فعل، صفت، قید دیگر یا حتی کل جمله را توصیف یا کامل کند.
قیدها معمولاً به این سؤالها پاسخ میدهند:
How? → چطور؟
When? → چه زمانی؟
Where? → کجا؟
How often? → چند وقت یکبار؟
How much / To what degree? → تا چه حد؟
How likely? → با چه احتمالی؟
Examples:
She speaks slowly.
او آهسته صحبت میکند.
I saw him yesterday.
من دیروز او را دیدم.
Come here.…
این قیدها معمولاً قبل از adjective یا adverb قرار میگیرند:
It’s very cold.
She’s extremely talented.
He runs really fast.
That’s too expensive.
The movie was quite interesting.
She speaks very slowly.
ساختار:
Adverb + Adjective
very beautiful
extremely difficult
really interesting
quite expensive
Examples:
The movie was really interesting.
This is an extremely difficult question.
She’s very talented.
ق…
quite → late را توصیف میکند.
✅وقتی چند قید در یک جمله داریم
یک الگوی رایج برای قرار دادن قیدها این است:
Manner + Place + Time
یعنی:
How + Where + When
مثلاً:
She sang beautifully at the concert last night.
How?
beautifully
Where?
at the concert
When?
last night
Example:
He worked quietly in his room all day.
quietly → Manner
in his room → Place
all day → Time
این یک الگوی رایج است، نه یک قانون آهنین.…
2. چند نکته گرامری مهم ویدیو (پارت سوم)
🔹 1. Could you please...?
برای درخواست مؤدبانه:
Could you please turn down the volume?
از:
Turn down the volume.
خیلی مؤدبانهتره.
حتی میتونی بگی:
Would you mind turning down the volume?
که مؤدبانهتر و نرمتره.
🔹 2. Would you mind + -ing?
Would you mind turning down the volume?
یعنی:
«اشکالی داره صدا رو کم کنی؟»
نکته مهم:
بعد از Would you mind باید verb + ing بیاد.
❌ Would yo…
عبارات مهم و کاربردی ویدیو (پارت دوم)
If you don't mind, that would be great.
یعنی:
اگه براتون مشکلی نیست، خیلی خوب میشه.
⭐️ If you don't mind... یکی از مهمترین الگوهای مؤدبانه در انگلیسیه.
If you don't mind, could you move over a little?
«اگه اشکالی نداره، میشه یه کم جابهجا بشید؟»
I'll watch later.
یعنی:
بعداً نگاهش میکنم.
I'll = I will
برای تصمیمی که همان لحظه میگیریم:
Okay, I'll do it later.
باشه، بعداً انجامش…
عبارات مهم و کاربردی ویدیو (پارت اول)
turn down the volume
یعنی: صدای چیزی را کم کردن
Could you please turn down the volume?
میشه لطفاً صدای دستگاه رو کم کنید؟
🔹 turn down = کم کردن شدت صدا/حرارت/نور و...
مقابلش:
turn up the volume = صدا را زیاد کردن
turn the volume down = صدا را کم کردن
use headphones
یعنی: از هدفون استفاده کردن
Could you use headphones?
یعنی:
«میشه از هدفون استفاده کنی؟»
🔹 در انگلیسی معمولاً میگوی…
برای «ربطی به این موضوع/چیز نداره» در انگلیسی چندین ساختار خیلی رایج داریم؛ بعضیها خنثیاند، بعضی محاورهای و بعضی تأکیدیتر.
1.
have nothing to do with
یکی از رایجترینها = هیچ ربطی به … نداشتن
• This has nothing to do with you.
این هیچ ربطی به تو نداره.
• His personal life has nothing to do with his job.
زندگی شخصیاش ربطی به کارش نداره.
• That has nothing to do with what we’re talking about.
اون هیچ ربطی به چیز…
خب این روزها که برقا خیلی میره و خاموشی داریم چه جوری به انگلیسی بگیم!
برای «برق رفتن/اومدن» در انگلیسی آمریکایی چند عبارت خیلی رایج داریم. نکته مهم اینه که power در مکالمه خیلی طبیعیتر از electricity استفاده میشه.
⚡ وقتی برق میرود
1. The power went out.
برق رفت. ← رایجترین و طبیعیترین
The power went out last night.
دیشب برق رفت.
2. We lost power.
برقمون رفت. ← خیلی محاورهای و رایج
We lost power for about…
#conversational_skill
How can I kindly ask someone sitting next to me on the train to turn the volume down?
چه جوری مودبانه از کسی که کنار ما در قطار، اتوبوس یا مترو نشسته بخوایم که صدای موزیکشو کم کنه؟
ویدیو رو ببینید تا در پست بعدی نکات مهمشو براتون بفرستم.
Join us here:
@learn_english_with_azi
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😢1
Signed Shazdeh Koochulo | شازده کوچولو
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @learn_english_with_azi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آموزش آسان زبان انگلیسی @RRELE · 23,158 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
دکتر مریم آقایی | روانشناس بالینی @dr_maryamaghaei · 40,248 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
متافیزیک سینرژی @astro_synergy · 26,159 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English with Azi” (@learn_english_with_azi), 551 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/learn_english_with_azi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
