Директ лег у всех?
💯8

Channel
@leadi_tudi_sudi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
418subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001651581161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leadi_tudi_sudi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leadi_tudi_sudi |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 418 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 419 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 422 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 425 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 426 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 430 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 430 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
138 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 46 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 24.6% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 6.52% | |
| 😨 | 9 | 6.52% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 6.52% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 5.80% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 5.07% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 3.62% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.62% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.725% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.725% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.725% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 27 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leadi_tudi_sudi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 September 2024 to 27 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Директ лег у всех?
💯8
Я думал такое в 90х осталось) это наш клиент, ведём Яндекс Директ.
Друзья, нужна Ваша помощь! "Как Краснодарские предприниматели встречают конкурентов с Дальнего Востока" Сегодня ночью в офис Владивостокской шинной компании "Альянс-Импорт" по адресу посёлок Победитель, 11 проникли неизвестные, взломав двери офиса. Что интересно, что ничего не было украдено, ни денежные средства, ни техника, ни документы. Однако взломщик провел "фото-сессию" как стикеров, размещенных на стене с за…
😱3
Несерьезный подкаст «Хочу от тебя идей» Мы тут подумали, что вещать про директ на серьезных щщах в пятницу -это ту матч. А поболтать хочется. Решили провести тестовый эфир с Димой, где обсудим забавные случаи из карьеры, проговорим «как найти первого клиента» (я расскажу, как это было у меня) и почему с маркетологами нужно дружить. Можно будет не только повеселиться, но и взять что-то на вооружение в работу. Вооб…
Новое направление канала: фокус на результаты и клиентов Последние несколько месяцев размышлял о том, стоит ли продолжать вести этот канал. В итоге пришел к выводу: пока есть входящие клиенты — будем двигаться дальше. Однако пытаться охватить всё и для всех — не самая эффективная стратегия. За время работы лучшие результаты показали проекты в следующих нишах: - заводы-производители, - автошколы, - медицинские цент…
❤3👍2
Впервые за 10 лет такой кейс. Взломали аккаунт с главным доступом, вырубили всю рекламу ночью и включили свою рекламу какого-то говноканала в ТГ. Такой вот понедельник
😨9🤯4
Мне тут предложили освоить профессию интернет маркетолога. Как думаете, стоит?
😁4👍2
На каждый Новый год дарим своим клиентам, с которыми работаем год и более вкусные подарочки. Вкуснейший мед (сам ем) с эко пасеки @artemzharov и его Пчелошеринга @pchelosharing_news Просто скрины от довольных клиентов)
🔥3👍1
Вот сюда пойду) 📆#20ноября (ср) с 10:00 до 19:00 📌 Конференция "Тренды бизнеса 2025" На одной площадке выступят 5 спикеров - представители лидирующих компаний на рынке, вас ждет 8 часов актуального и полезного контента, а также нетворкинг на 150 участников 🗣 Анетта Орлова (г.Москва) - психолог, кандидат наук, телеведущая 🗣 Марк Ерёмин (г.Санкт-Петербург)- автор самого крупного в России Travel блога, собственник ма…
👍2😁1
У Яндекса как всегда
😡3👍1😭1
Ну какой "прахрамист-продахт-сеооффвсего" ux этот придумывал? Неужели не понятно, что фильтр по умолчанию нужен не от меньшего значения конверсий к большему, а наоборот? Зачем клиенту знать сколько конверсий у него НЕ было? Сори, накипело просто.
👍10🤣7💯1
Бизнес клубы или "Я раньше был из грустных дурачин, и у меня на это пять причин" Последний месяц состою в бизнес сообществе с платной подпиской. Какое мнение спустя месяц? -> "Какого фига раньше не пошел!?" На этот вопрос есть рифмованный ответ: "Я раньше был из грустных дурачин, и у меня на это пять причин". Простите, те, кто дальше хотел пропеть причины. Рифмы хватило на одну строчку. - Первая причина. Эгоцентр…
👍10🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @leadi_tudi_sudi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лиды туды-сюды (трафик и заявки для производств)” (@leadi_tudi_sudi), 418 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leadi_tudi_sudi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.