Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LC SCAM & CALLOUT

Channel

LC SCAM & CALLOUT

@lcogreports

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

155subscribers

+96 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003923407621
TypeChannel
Username@lcogreports
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lcogreports

Growth

591551079 August 2026 — 59 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59 subscribers17 August 2026 — 71 subscribers24 August 2026 — 86 subscribers31 August 2026 — 99 subscribers9 September 2026 — 133 subscribers18 September 2026 — 155 subscribers9 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:41155+22
9 Sept 2026, 13:40133+34
31 Aug 2026, 03:2399+13
24 Aug 2026, 16:2386+15
17 Aug 2026, 10:4271+12
10 Aug 2026, 06:0159no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:4859first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣8100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC9 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

i want to clear my friend’s name regarding this callout (https://t.me/sns_sumbungan/26801?single) @kienshish, first of all, you cannot just make assumptions and immediately drag someone into a call-out without even bothering to clarify the situation with them first. if you have an issue concerning my friend, then address it with them directly instead of making conclusions based solely on a vouch. i’ve known kyzeroi

9 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC9 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

prt. 2, see pictures above for context. so, no. i highly doubt that person is my friend, and honestly, the claims being made don’t really add up. #1 lagi mismo siyang nawawalan ng accounts — either suspended, disabled, or otherwise inaccessible. so it doesn’t make sense to immediately assume that she’s behind an account like that. #2 she can barely even fix or recover her own accounts whenever something happens to

8 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC52 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Username of person being reported: @islashopee @islabelleshop @islashops Telegram ID number: 8460893613 6887502748 1309689482 Nalaman kong iisa lang pala kayo ni islabelleshop at islashops 🥲 ang dami na ring nascam. Kaya ka pala madaming vouch magbibigay ka ng acc for 1m lang or less tapos hindi ka na magrereply pag nireport 🥹 Channel: https://t.me/islabelleshoppee

1 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC144 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Hello! Beware of this buyer. My co-admin (kesha) dmed her because she was looking for CHATGPT SOLO. She did not indicate that she WANTS INVITE but my co-admin clearly said that it’s CHATGPT GO SOLO. She (buyer) even insisted that SOLO MEANS INVITE. If she already HAD a transaction of VIA INVITE, then edi sana doon sya bumili. Gaano ba kahirap itype ang 3 or 6 letters na INV or INVITE pag nagllf? Tas kami pa mamaliin.

🤣8

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @lcogreports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LC SCAM & CALLOUT” (@lcogreports), 155 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lcogreports.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.