Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lazzyy Trader community

Channel

Lazzyy Trader community

@lazzyytraderscommunity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232523470
TypeChannel
Username@lazzyytraderscommunity
DescriptionWelcome to Lazzyy Trader official community; Disclaimer: Risk with what you can afford to loose and don't risk more than 30% of your account at any given situation. Losses are inevitable in forex but with a proper risk management and discipline we'll fly
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lazzyytraderscommunity

Growth

697 August 2026 — 69 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 00:1769no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:0369first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
2
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5851.8%
🔥2825.0%
👍108.93%
👏108.93%
🥰65.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lazzyytraderscommunity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 16 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Feb 2026, 16:35 UTC38 views4 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Professional Yield Meets Provable Gaming** @solstice_tg: Delta-neutral strategies earning 16%+ APY. Backed by Deus X Capital ($1B+ AUM). $USX stablecoin earns automatically. Flare Farming active NOW. @Vault777Casino: Every game outcome verifiable on-chain. Chainlink VRF proves fairness mathematically. No KYC. Instant withdrawals. CertiK audit in progress. Why both matter: Solstice shows DeFi can deliver institutio

👍4

18 Feb 2026, 16:35 UTC33 views10 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

The Earn & Play Combo Earn Stable. Play Fair. Compound Smart. @solstice_tg delivers 16.2% APY delta-neutral yield on Solana. Your funds earn consistently whether markets pump or dump. $166M TVL. Institutional backing. Zero directional risk. @Vault777Casino offers provably fair on-chain gaming with Chainlink VRF verification. Bet-to-earn returns 1% as $VAULT tokens. Real house edge just 1%. DAO ownership launching

5👏5

16 Feb 2026, 09:05 UTC38 views15 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Vault777: Where Mathematics Replaces Trust The Invisible Problem With Every Online Casino You click "spin." The wheel turns. You win or lose. But how do you know it was actually random? How do you know the casino didn't see your bet size and adjust the odds? How do you know the "certified RNG" isn't rigged in the house's favor? You don't. You just trust. @Vault777Casino eliminates this trust requirement entirely

🔥87

13 Feb 2026, 21:06 UTC53 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Vault777: The DAO Casino That Pays You to Play Casinos Have Always Won. Now You Can Own the House. Every casino in history operates on one principle: the house always wins. Players bet, most lose, the casino keeps the profits. @Vault777Casino flips this model completely. You're Not Just a Player - You're a Shareholder Traditional casinos keep 100% of profits for owners and shareholders. Vault777 distributes prof

5🔥5👍1

13 Feb 2026, 15:35 UTC46 views11 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

## How Vault777 Could Revolutionize On-Chain Gaming The Trust Problem Killing Online Gaming Online casinos generate $250+ billion annually, but the industry is broken. Players can't verify fairness. Operators can manipulate outcomes. Trust is required, but rarely deserved. @Vault777Casino doesn't just fix this - it sets a new standard for ALL on-chain gaming. The Provably Fair Blueprint Vault777's Chainlink VRF

6👏5

13 Feb 2026, 09:10 UTC40 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

⭐️ Stop overpaying for Telegram Stars Been buying stars through the official app? You're paying 40% more than you need to. StarNinja = Same stars, 40% cheaper, zero KYC, crypto payments only. Used it for 6 months. Saved $200+. No issues. Search StarNinja App

4🥰2

13 Feb 2026, 08:28 UTC43 views13 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Provably Fair Gaming. Finally. The online gambling industry is worth $250 billion, but it runs on blind trust. Players hope games are fair, trust the house isn't cheating, and pray withdrawals get processed. @Vault777Casino eliminates trust entirely. How It Works: Built on Arbitrum, Vault777 uses Chainlink VRF (Verifiable Random Function) for all game outcomes. Every bet, every spin, every result is cryptographic

9🔥4

12 Feb 2026, 07:56 UTC52 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The $250 Billion Online Gambling Industry Runs on Blind Trust. Vault777 Just Changed the Game. Every day, millions of people gamble online. They hope the games are fair. They trust the random number generators aren't rigged. They believe the casino isn't cheating. But there's no way to actually verify any of it. You just have to trust. @Vault777Casino eliminates trust from the equation entirely. Welcome to Provabl

9🔥3🥰1

11 Feb 2026, 19:31 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Solana's Institutional-Grade Yield Infrastructure Has Arrived The DeFi yield problem is simple: high returns come with high risk. When markets crash, your "amazing APY" disappears along with your principal. Professional investors solve this with delta-neutral strategies - earning consistent returns regardless of market direction. But until now, these strategies were locked behind institutional walls. @solstice_tg

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lazzyytraderscommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,127,933 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lazzyy Trader community” (@lazzyytraderscommunity), 69 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lazzyytraderscommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.