Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЮРИСТ АННА ЦАПЛИНА обоснованная визуализация

Channel

ЮРИСТ АННА ЦАПЛИНА обоснованная визуализация

@lawyertsaplina

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

835subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001640965153
TypeChannel
Username@lawyertsaplina
Created11 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lawyertsaplina

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

834837835.57 August 2026 — 837 subscribers8 August 2026 — 837 subscribers16 August 2026 — 834 subscribers30 August 2026 — 836 subscribers9 September 2026 — 835 subscribers8357 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 834–837 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 08:01835-1
30 Aug 2026, 17:32836+2
16 Aug 2026, 18:35834-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:21837no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:53837first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 04s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8947.6%
🔥4926.2%
3518.7%
🎉126.42%
😱21.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2023 to 23 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 May 2023, 09:31 UTC≈2,860 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

11 мая был первый день рождения канала. Спасибо всем, кто подписан и читает посты) За год было проведено много работы. Решила собрать все рубрики и ссылки на материалы в двух постах выше. Даже не верится, сколько всего было подготовлено. Благодарю каждого кто со мной! 🎈🎈🎈 Расскажите, как у вас дела с внедрением юридического дизайна ?

29🎉12🔥4

23 May 2023, 09:30 UTC≈2,640 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЙ ДИЗАЙН ПОЧЕМУ LEGAL DESIGN ВЫЗЫВАЕТ ВОПРОСЫ ТОП 6 ЗАБЛУЖДЕНИЙ О ЮРИДИЧЕСКОМ ДИЗАЙНЕ РАБОТА С ТЕКСТОМ И СТРУКТУРОЙ ПОЧЕМУ ТЕКСТ НЕ УБЕЖДАЕТ? А ЧТО СКАЖЕТ СУД? ПОЧЕМУ ДОКУМЕНТ ТЯЖЕЛО ДОЧИТАТЬ ДО КОНЦА? ЧЕК-ЛИСТ: КАК СОСТАВЛЯТЬ ЗАГОЛОВКИ ВИЗУАЛИЗАЦИЯ ВИЗУАЛИЗАЦИЯ В ДОГОВОРЕ: ЗАЧЕМ НУЖНА ОГОВОРКА СМЫСЛ ВИЗУАЛИЗАЦИИ НАЧИНАЕТСЯ С ТЕКСТА ПРОГРАММЫ ДЛЯ ВИЗУАЛИЗАЦИИ КАК СХЕМА ПОМОГАЕТ ПРОДАВАТЬ ЮР. УСЛУГИ КАК СУ

👍11

23 May 2023, 09:29 UTC≈2,040 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ОБЩЕЕ ОБ АВТОРЕ О ЧЕМ ТГ-КАНАЛ ВЕБИНАРЫ ИСКОВОЕ ЗАЯВЛЕНИЕ ОТ ИДЕИ ДО ПОДАЧИ Пример искового заявления (автор Фомина Е.) ⠀ Схема к исковому заявлению 1 Схема к исковому заявлению 2 ОТЗЫВ НА ИСКОВОЕ ЗАЯВЛЕНИЕ Образец отзыва на исковое заявление (автор Фомина Е., автор схемы – Цаплина А.) ЮР. ДИЗАЙН: ОПЫТ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ В СУДЕ (спикеры: Елена Фомина, Максим Козлов, Азиза Степанян, Наталья Изъюрова, Анна Цаплина) ⠀ МАКСИМ

👍4🔥3

15 May 2023, 06:37 UTC≈1,810 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Коллеги, спешу поделиться с вами подборкой каналов, которые ведут практикующие юристы «На мушке» - канал Юлии Мухиной - юриста по семейным спорам - о работе в консалтинге, нескучной юриспруденции, советах для молодых юристов и поисках work-life balance 🤓 Ольга Новикова |О стиле в документах и в жизни - канал бизнес-юриста «Гриц и партнеры» и основателя Академии дизайна документов. О буднях юриста и о том, как с удо

👍112

25 Apr 2023, 17:52 UTC≈1,680 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Право интеллектуальной собственности – загадка? Многие юристы шутят, что 4 часть Гражданского кодекса прошла мимо них. К сожалению, во многих юридических вузах действительно не раскрывают весь потенциал данной сферы. Для тех, кто интересуется данным направлением не только в теории, но и встречается на практике, предлагаю подписаться на ТГ-канал ПРАВО БЕЗ ОШИБОК Автора канала – Наталья Гринюк – IP-юрист, 16+ лет в

👍4🔥4

15 Apr 2023, 08:27 UTC≈1,510 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как сделать различную нумерацию страниц в одном документе На последнем эфире коллеги задали очень хороший вопрос. Часто в одном файле мы создаём договор от одной даты и приложения к нему от другой даты. ❓Как сделать так, чтобы нумерация страниц приложения начиналась заново, а не продолжала нумерацию договора? Ответ смотрите в видео 🎞

👍81

15 Apr 2023, 08:27 UTC≈1,360 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥7👍5

27 Mar 2023, 12:39 UTC≈1,540 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, кто любит подарки? Я думаю большинство. Для всех, кто уже ускорил процесс разработки договоров с помощью чек-листов, мы подготовили еще кое-что полезное. Решили с Еленой Фоминой и Екатериной Крыловой сделать закрытый мастер-класс, где разберем договор по 3 критериям: 1) содержание 2) текст 3) форма На примере рассмотрим: − как составить понятный, лаконичный и емкий по смыслу договор − какие приемы ра

👍6🔥2

23 Mar 2023, 11:07 UTC≈1,370 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍13🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lawyertsaplina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Mar 2023, 18:56 UTCAnonymous Poll82 voters

А Вы используете в своей работе чек-листы?

  1. Да29%
  2. Хотел(а) бы попробовать38%
  3. Слышал(а), но не использую33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2023 to 23 May 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЮРИСТ АННА ЦАПЛИНА обоснованная визуализация” (@lawyertsaplina), 835 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawyertsaplina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.