Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐋𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 | пвл

@lawrenceyo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

91subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002559286798
TypeChannel
Username@lawrenceyo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/lawrenceyo

Growth

909190.58 Aug 2026, 17:16 — 90 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:13 — 91 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:17 — 91 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:169 Aug 2026, 14:17
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:1791no change
8 Aug 2026, 23:1391+1
8 Aug 2026, 17:1690first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
188.0%
avg views ÷ 91 subscribers
Avg views / post
171
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (10 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,224
Reactions total249
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
113
Videos
30
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

303 reactions across 16 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53821692855127015395317.5%
custom 54180320219161369313210.6%
custom 5418311800380761689278.91%
custom 5334985547892933646268.58%
custom 5417914640459934490206.60%
custom 5456633388381287999185.94%
custom 5379696148854387480175.61%
custom 5417928203966655310175.61%
custom 5382136639466284500165.28%
custom 5382332958126418864134.29%
custom 5420512417069179061113.63%
custom 5458577535392589244103.30%
custom 532340722230101354682.64%
custom 545849113353549964172.31%
custom 538192789546576062651.65%
custom 539565377342513308141.32%
custom 531670466813758825730.99%
custom 545657112853536114130.99%
❤‍🔥30.99%
custom 538198351958721298620.66%
6 further kinds82.64%

Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lawrenceyo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC132 views39 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video

⠀ 〰️〰️〰️〰️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️ две дольки шоколада 〰️〰️〰️ 🤩𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒐𝒏 & 🤩𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒔 🍂 #пардоны #лондон #париж ⠀

custom 545663338838128799918custom 545857753539258924410custom 54584911335354996417custom 54565711285353611413custom 54584852408403638391

3 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC74 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @padecaleFile

‘’ Фем!Лондон, занявшая место своего брата и надевшая корону столицы. Впервые замечающая, как расступаются под полами её платья люди. Слышащая, как объявляют её вход в помещение. Отказывающаяся от поданной руки. Уверенная, что она знает лучше. #сторонка

custom 54180320219161369318custom 54203284077853160171

31 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC117 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @westminster_palacePhoto

mom I'm in love with Margaret Thatcher

custom 541791464045993449012custom 54179282039666553107custom 54205124170691790615custom 54180320219161369311custom 54182460830861653591

29 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC168 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

следующий пост с

  1. berlin + paris28%
  2. london + paris67%
  3. rome + paris19%
  4. fem!london + fem!paris44%
  5. paris18%
  6. rome11%
  7. new york21%

The shares total 208%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 541792820396665531010custom 54180320219161369316custom 54205124170691790613

27 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC120 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vos_claquettesPhoto

🤩 Ладно. И у Рима, и фемРима странные вайбы. Но если у обычного Лучиано вайбы какие-то мерзкие и даже жутковатые (my opinion, я так чувствую, хаха). То у его фем версии прям вайбы мамы, которая задушит в объятиях и будет по голове гладить, говоря что-то на подобии «оставляете мать, да?». Ещё с таким несчастным лицом. Или она будет кричать в след, хватаясь за сердце: «А МАТЕРИ ПЛОХО!»; 🌟 Ну, и ещё топ фраз: «Доведёте

custom 54183118003807616897

27 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @imposibiVideo

🌹❤️🤩ad idea – 🤩irl in red 🔤ыло плохой идеей позвонить тебе. Настолько плохой, что теперь я ещё больше запуталась. 🔤ыло плохой идеей думать, что ты – та самая. Настолько плохой, что теперь всё не так. 🌹 арты: La Seine, okaeri 🌟🌟🌟фем ⭐️ #пардоны ❣️

custom 54180320219161369315

26 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC622 views43 reactions15 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

⠀ ❤️❤️❤️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟 ❤️❤️❤️ 𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕾𝖍𝖔𝖗𝖊𝖘 𝖔𝖋 𝕰𝖉𝖊𝖓 ❤️❤️❤️ берега эдема ! could 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 — a capital with 🤍❤️🆘📵🟨– ever have imagined that one day he would end up 🔬🧿🧲? after the 🍉, the world he knows begins to fall apart. fOrced to undergo a psychological evaluation, William Windsor 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 must

custom 541831180038076168920custom 541803202191613693112custom 54179146404599344908custom 54205124170691790613

23 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC132 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @LaseineeePhoto

!Мейл версия Эдинбург До бритвы/После бритвы #Edinburgh

custom 53823329581264188647custom 53821275642003873182

23 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC149 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @padecale

‘’ Уильям редко делает комплименты/замечания внешности Пьера, потому что все делают комплименты его внешности, и никто не комментирует его характер :( Уильям постоянно говорит, что Пьер упрямый, безрассудный, шумный, смешной, храбрый, наглый и так далее. И он реально видит это, а не его внешность. #сторонка

custom 538216928551270153914

22 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC242 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⠀ о какой концентрации может идти речь… 🌟🤩 чудесный автор арта – @milk_with_lutik #пардоны #париж #лондон ⠀

custom 538216928551270153918custom 53819278954657606265custom 53823329581264188645

22 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC106 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @victorkramolaPhoto

🤩: Ваш персонаж как карта таро. IV. Император (The Emperor) Хозяин, Правитель, Законодатель, Отец. Власть, Авторитет. Сила разума, преобладающая над эмоциями. Властный, ответственный и рациональный человек. Часто это руководитель, бизнесмен или сильный покровитель с высоким социальным статусом. Прямое положение: Это карта власти, стабильности, структуры и контроля. Она символизирует мужское начало, логику, дисци

custom 533498554789293364611custom 53821692855127015391

21 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC255 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

⠀ 👋👋👋 pov: вам намекают на отношения с каким-то парижем ( вы встречаетесь ) gallavich reference 🖤 — What’s your type? — Brunette. — I am downstairs… — Batshit crazy. — Check. — Packing nine inches. — … 🌷 Хочу поздравить с совершеннолетием талантливо

custom 533498554789293364615custom 53956537734251330814custom 53167046681375882573custom 53637876200547467291custom 53821692855127015391

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lawrenceyo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

следующий пост с

  1. berlin + paris28%
  2. london + paris67%
  3. rome + paris19%
  4. fem!london + fem!paris44%
  5. paris18%
  6. rome11%
  7. new york21%

The shares total 208%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 269,953 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐋𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 | пвл” (@lawrenceyo), 91 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawrenceyo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.