Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🖊 Лавовая Лампа! - OCverse

@lavlampOCverse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003197617364
TypeChannel
Username@lavlampOCverse
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 28 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lavlampOCverse

Growth

1511 Aug 2026, 08:48 — 15 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 00:16 — 15 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 08:4812 Aug 2026, 00:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:1615no change
11 Aug 2026, 08:4815first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
237.1%
avg views ÷ 15 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.6
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (28 December 202528 July 2026)
Views total249
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋2156.8%
💔718.9%
😭718.9%
👀25.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ах, да. Из хороших новостей... Мне оплатили замену корпуса на водонепроницаемый! 😅 Он из пластика, но мне пообещали, что он долго протянет—

💋1

28 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А почему у нас в списке есть...— Ох. Ничего. Не стоит всё записывать вот так... к-какой кошмар.

💋1

28 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

...Узнать, что в баре ночью было...?

💋1

28 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

За камеру штраф обсудить... Ещё кое-что...

💋1

28 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня нужно пройтись по лавкам, проверить на наличие запрещёнки. Бруклин ругался вчера на неё... Снова наши запреты никого не волнуют. Какой кошмар. На прошлую ярмарку так тоже что-то нелегальное принесли.

💋1

28 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC33 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Итак... доброе утро. Вроде бы вчера было без происшествий...? Да? Единственное, что я не смогла объявить то, что у нас будет, но... ахаха... Кажется, все были увлечены немного другим и им было не до объявлений. Не то, чтоб это было плохо... Лучше, чем если б все слушали, как я едва языком перебираю. Так что всё в порядке...

💋1

7 Jan 2026, 11:13 UTC675 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Иногда... ...Не важно. 😅

💋1

7 Jan 2026, 11:13 UTC658 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мы с Радиохостом... скажем, вроде как поладили? К-конечно, большую часть времени мы сидим, забившись каждый в свой угол, но... но зато хоть что-то, да?

💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lavlampOCverse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 759,112 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

[EVENT!!]𝐵𝓁𝓊𝑒 𝒮𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓌𝒷𝑒𝓇𝓇𝓎 𝒴𝑜𝑔𝓊𝓇𝓉 𝒞𝑜𝑜𝓀𝒾𝑒!! | OCverse
@Bluestrawberryyogut · 22
1 post
[ʇuǝʌǝ] qɹıƃɥʇsɥɹooɯ ıs ןıɐɹ
@brightshroom · 20
1 post
𝓔𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓽 | 𝐵𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑛 𝑆𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑦 ఌ
@BrownSugar_Cookie · 38
1 post
Хай? Ивент! Candy Corduroy and Walnut Ferrero
@CandyCorduroyAndWalnutFerreroOC · 21
1 post
.𓏴𝅄 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐓! 𝐶𝑖𝑛𝑛а𝑚𝑜𝑛ᡃ࡚R𝑜𝑙𝑙 ᡃ࡚𝑐о𝑜𝑘𝑖𝑒 𝅄
@cinnie0 · 29
1 post
<Ꭼvᴇnᴛ> ?¿ Diary of the deceased soul Cotton ¿?
@CottonCookieOC · 27
1 post
[EVENT] >GingerSprinkles<
@gingerspri · 22
1 post
𝘽𝙖𝙙 𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙥𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙮𝙨|Event🪭
@Grapebbb · 30
1 post
[EVENT ! ] < 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙾𝙽𝙴 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝙾𝙽𝙻𝚈 𝙷𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 ! >
@HoundDisasterCircus · 23
1 post
Event!𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑠/Blog
@lovelust9 · 27
1 post
•.Macadam records.•
@makadamcookierecords · 37
1 post
[EVENT]𐌲ᥲдᥲ᧘κᥲ κ ʙᥲɯᥙⲙ уᥴ᧘уᴦᥲⲙ||𐌲᧐ᥴᥰ᧐жᥲ 𐌺ρᥲᥴныᥔ 𐌿ᥱᴛᥱρᥴᥙᴛ ᧘учɯᥲя
@Moon_Clever_cookie · 32
1 post
ㅤ 𖦹
@myceliumcookie · 26
1 post
[EVENT]꒰‌ 𐙚 𝑺𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒊𝒄𝒆𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒚 𝑪𝒐𝒐𝒌𝒊𝒆
@ocverse_serviceberrycookie · 28
1 post
.панфорте.я.полагаю..
@panfortecookie · 26
1 post
Event! Radiant Agate
@Radiantagate228 · 8
1 post
{ ивент! ʳᵉᵈ ᵖⁱᵉᵗᵉʳˢⁱᵗᵉ ᶜᵒᵒᵏⁱᵉ
@redpietersitecookie · 33
1 post
ָ ♡゙ 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐓! 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑡 ᡃ࡚ᡃ࡚𝑃𝑟𝑒t𝑧𝑒𝑙 𝅄ᡃ࡚ᡃ𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑖е ꒱ᤴ ֺ︩
@saltpretz · 24
1 post
𓏴 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐓! 𝑆𝑝а𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑖 ᡃ࡚ᡃ࡚𝐵𝑜𝑙о𝑛𝑒𝑧𝑒ᡃ࡚𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑖𝑒 𝅄 ִ ۫ ֢
@SpagettiBoloneze · 30
1 post
[EVENT] ❥ Monsieur le ᴨѣчᴇньᴇ ᴄᴛѣйᴋъ бᴧю – оɸицѣᴩъ и ᴨоᴋᴧоннɪᴋъ ʙᴄяᴋихъ дᴀʍъ.
@steakblueOcverse · 23
1 post
[EVENT] Undead Marigold's office
@undeadmarigoldcookie · 26
1 post
[🌾EVENT!!] ~ Wheatgrass Cookie|OCverse
@WheatgrassCookie_OCverse · 32
1 post
[EVENT] — "Wolf in Sheep's Clothing" Cookie is in touch!
@WolfInSheepsClothing_ocverse · 45
1 post
[EVENT].Yearn for Yearn, Covet Crisp Cookie
@YearnForYearnOCVERSE · 22
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🖊 Лавовая Лампа! - OCverse” (@lavlampOCverse), 15 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lavlampOCverse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.