Channel
@lavka_kpi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
110subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001309980760 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lavka_kpi |
| Description | Бурхливе життя однієї лавки на Політехнічній та дослідження її впливу на простір вулиці. Якщо проходите повз – зробіть фото або запишіть відео та надішліть в наш чат @kpi_urban_chat або напряму @belenko_me. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 8 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lavka_kpi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 110 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Чому вчить КПІ краще всього? Тому, що жить треба довго, і тоді ти матимеш можливість побачити як підарас, який спиздив твою обществєнну лавку пропливає мімо посади ректора КПІ. Унізітельно, позорно, навіть не з бронзою. Хуйовий жанр глумітся з неудачніков, але вася стіки гівна наробив живим штукам, що я лікую просто. Толі єщо будіт 🥹
Ці люди не люблять сидіти на лавках 😬
Два роки тому ми з вами зробили лавку на Політехнічній. І приблизно два роки тому її вкрали. Всі розуміють, хто це був. І чому камера, яка дивилася прямо на лавку, випадковим чином перестала працювати в той день. Давайте побажаємо тому, хто її вкрав, сидіти довго 👏
МАМО
Photo, posted without a caption
Мій звіт за перший рік у Київраді. Демо-версія. Рік тому я склала присягу. Певно, вже треба робити звіт, але формально маю час до кінця року. Зараз приймається бюджет, є купа роботи по депфондам і проєкти на окрузі, а тому тримайте поки отаку демо-версію звіту. Для більшості вона буде навіть цікавіша. А справжній звіт я обов'язково опублікую. Трохи пізніше 😉 @semenovatut
До речі, де я?
Приємно знати, що я стала початком великих змін
Photo, posted without a caption
Ех, була б тут якась така ЛАВКА
Ще раз: ми не могли порушити механізм встановлення лавки, бо тупо не існує такого механізму.
Ксенія Семенова, депутатка КМР, запитала в мера: як встановлювати лавки так, щоб це було легально, та ніхто їх не демонтував? Відповідь КМДА чітка: немає ніякого алгоритму. Для комерційних МАФів є правила, для некомерційних — немає.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lavka_kpi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,420,435 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лавка КПІ” (@lavka_kpi), 110 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lavka_kpi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.