3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 888–889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:38
888
-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:20
889
no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:02
889
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 888 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
15 (17 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
563
Reactions total
68
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
201 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
84
41.8%
🥰
44
21.9%
👍
22
10.9%
🎉
15
7.46%
❤🔥
11
5.47%
🤩
8
3.98%
💔
5
2.49%
🔥
5
2.49%
😱
4
1.99%
😍
3
1.49%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Показываем еще одну часть уходовой линейки Lavelle Skin
В Aqua Glow представлены два крема для ежедневной заботы о коже:
Увлажнение и красота – дарит коже мягкость, упругость и естественное сияние. Комбуча и витамин Е помогают коже удерживать влагу.
Питание и восстановление – питает, укрепляет защитный барьер, благодаря чему кожа выглядит свежей и отдохнувшей. В составе масло ши и ниацинамид для снижения воспалени…
Продолжаем рассказывать о линейках Lavelle Skin
Perfect Balance — уход для жирной кожи с ниацинамидом, салициловой кислотой и цинком PCA для чистоты без лишнего блеска.
В линейке:
Пенка и гель для умывания
Тоник с пантенолом
Очищающая маска на основе каолина
Уже на маркетплейсах!
Знакомим вас с линейками Lavelle skin
Aqua Glow – это увлажнение, комфорт и здоровое сияние кожи благодаря пантенолу, аллантоину, алоэ вера и ниацинамиду, что особенно необходимо летом.
В линейке:
Пенка и гель для умывания
Мицеллярная вода с экстрактами авокадо и кокоса
Гель для кожи вокруг глаз с эффектом жидких патчей
Тоник с кофеином
Уже на маркетплейсах, добавляйте в корзину!
Напоминаем: если вы живете в Сибири, то вы можете приобрести Lavelle Collection в сети НОВЭКС. Там представлен широкий ассортимент наших средств!
А еще в НОВЭКС регулярно проходят выгодные акции, поэтому это отличный повод попробовать наши новинки или пополнить запасы любимых средств по приятной цене.
Выбирайте удобный формат покупки: загляните в ближайший магазин, оформите заказ в интернет-магазине или через мобил…
Какую помаду выбрать? 💄
Рассказываем о двух помадах Lavelle Collection, в чем их сходство и в чем отличие.
Lip Combo – для быстрого макияжа губ
Идеальный вариант для тех, кто любит практичность и всегда спешит. Lip Combo объединяет помаду и карандаш в одном двустороннем стике: с одной стороны – насыщенный цвет, с другой – карандаш для четкого контура. Текстура легко наносится, а разнообразие оттенков позволяет под…
Знаете, почему цинк так часто встречается в косметике для жирной и проблемной кожи?
Цинковая соль – компонент, который помогает контролировать выработку себума, уменьшает жирный блеск и способствует тому, чтобы несовершенства становились менее заметными. Именно поэтому её так любят использовать в средствах для глубокого очищения.
В очищающей маске Lavelle Skin Perfect Balance цинковая соль работает в паре с каолино…
Дарим полный набор новинок Lavelle Skin 🎁
Участвуйте в розыгрыше и получите шанс выиграть всю линейку ухода, которая подойдет именно вашей коже:
Aqua Glow – для увлажнения, комфорта и сияния
Perfect Balance – для свежести, матовости и ухода за жирной кожей
2 победителя, итоги – 3 июля
Конкурс проходит на странице Lavelle VK, присоединяйтесь!
Мы внимательно вас слушаем
В Lavelle ваше мнение — наша главная точка роста. Каждый комментарий и пожелание мы берём в работу, чтобы сделать продукты ещё удобнее, красивее и эффективнее. Сегодня в центре внимания невесомая рассыпчатая пудра Loose Powder с бархатным финишем и кофейный контуринг-стик Cream Stick.
Спасибо, что помогаете нам становиться лучше каждый день!
Это не просто маска, а повод поухаживать за собой
Пока вы листаете ленту, отвечаете на сообщения или выбираете, что посмотреть вечером, очищающая маска Lavelle Skin Perfect Balance помогает контролировать жирный блеск и делает кожу более свежей и ровной.
❤7🎉3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lavellecollection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если бы в отпуск можно было взять только один продукт Lavelle… ☀️✈️
Что бы выбрали?
Тоник для лица Lavelle skin32%
Duo stick контуринг и хайлайтер14%
Рассыпчатая пудра Loose Powder14%
Гель для бровей Strong14%
Масло для губ Lip Oil27%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 745,467 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lavelle Collection” (@lavellecollection), 888 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lavellecollection.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.