Channel
@lauraprofart_5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002060144553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lauraprofart_5 |
| Description | — 𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝘾𝙝𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙢𝙖𝙨 𝙞 𝙜𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙢𝙮 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙣𝙚𝙭𝙩 𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙜𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙞𝙩 𝙖𝙬𝙖𝙮 💘🌿 Oᴡɴᴇʀ:: @Christmas_Laura🌷 Bʀᴏᴛʜᴇʀ:: @layprofart ʙᴇsᴛɪᴇs:: @ginevra_weasley07 Iɴғᴏ:: @laurasinfo Офф стики:: 🐹, 🥞 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lauraprofart_5 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 30 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 30 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 8 | 19.0% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5411204256571078961 | 6 | 14.3% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 11.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 4.76% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 2.38% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2024 to 15 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥞:: устроить какой-то интерактив по поводу др?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed — чᴀйᴏᴋ.🌿🐹🐾 #𝐫𝐞̂𝐯𝐞𝐬 #𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 || ᴩᴇᴄᴛ
🥞:: вафельки! все, кто был подписан на https://t.me/diaryxgranger вернитесь, пожалуйста!!! ей удалили пдп💔 максимальный репост!!!
Signed — чᴀйᴏᴋ.🌿🐹🐾 #𝐫𝐞̂𝐯𝐞𝐬 #𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 || ᴩᴇᴄᴛ🐮
Го пишем воспоминания с племянницей
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Angelina
Чо завтра делаем кстати
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 54112042565710789611
Signed Angelina
Что на завтра?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Angelina
😎👍😁😐💫😤😁😮💨🥲 ⚜ Сделать репост ⌨ Быть подписанным 🔄 Прислать свой канал и воуля все готов
Signed Angelina
🥞:: вафельки, переходим!!!)🎀
Signed — чᴀйᴏᴋ.🌿🐹🐾 #𝐫𝐞̂𝐯𝐞𝐬 #𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 || ᴩᴇᴄᴛ🐮
Channel name was changed to «ПЕРЕХОД 🌴🌷𝐋𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐭🌷🌴»
ПЕРЕХОД 🌴🌷𝐋𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐭🌷🌴 pinned «🥞:: вафельки, я создала новый канал! буду очень рада видеть вас там! >🎀<»
🥞:: вафельки, я создала новый канал! буду очень рада видеть вас там! >🎀<
💔2🥰1
Signed — чᴀйᴏᴋ.🌿🐹🐾 #𝐫𝐞̂𝐯𝐞𝐬 #𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 || ᴩᴇᴄᴛ
🌟:: такс, надо оживлять канал. с кем вп? хочу 110.
❤1
Signed — чᴀйᴏᴋ.🌿🐹🐾 #𝐫𝐞̂𝐯𝐞𝐬 #𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 || ᴩᴇᴄᴛ
Одного мне найдите♨️
Signed — чᴀйᴏᴋ.🌿🐹🐾 #𝐫𝐞̂𝐯𝐞𝐬 #𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 || ᴩᴇᴄᴛ
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lauraprofart_5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🥞:: устроить какой-то интерактив по поводу др?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Го пишем воспоминания с племянницей
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Чо завтра делаем кстати
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что на завтра?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍵:: постик?>
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2024 to 15 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 988,917 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lauraprofart_5 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕХОД 🌴🌷𝐋𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐭🌷🌴” (@lauraprofart_5), 30 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lauraprofart_5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.