Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Comunicazione per l'impatto sociale

Channel

Comunicazione per l'impatto sociale

@latteschool

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

38subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001844581801
TypeChannel
Username@latteschool
Created15 May 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/latteschool

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

383938.57 August 2026 — 39 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39 subscribers9 September 2026 — 38 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 33 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 11:0238-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:1739no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:4839first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 15 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤753.8%
👍323.1%
🔥323.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2023 to 3 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2023, 09:32 UTC171 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

I 3 principi del Guardian sull'intelligenza artificiale generativa nel giornalismo: https://www.theguardian.com/help/insideguardian/2023/jun/16/the-guardians-approach-to-generative-ai

❤2

3 Jul 2023, 07:15 UTC160 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

The Verge ha chiesto a un campione di 2.000 statunitensi cosa sanno e cosa pensano dell'A.I. https://www.theverge.com/c/23753704/ai-chatgpt-data-survey-research

28 Jun 2023, 08:07 UTC134 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😒Ad oggi nessuna A.I. rispetterebbe l'A.I. Act dell'Unione Europea. Ne parla questo studio di ricercatori di Stanford. https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/06/15/eu-ai-act.html

👍2

9 Jun 2023, 10:11 UTC148 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/02/ai-taking-jobs/ Una inchiesta del Washington Post sull'impatto che già oggi sta avendo Chat GPT sul lavoro.

👍1

6 Jun 2023, 07:40 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Venerdì 16 giugno dalle ore 10 alle 18 ci sarà una Masterclass dal vivo, presso il nostro studio a Roma. Come si scrive una grande campagna? Tecniche narrative per il sociale è il titolo che abbiamo scelto per questa giornata formativa intensiva e progettuale insieme a Francesco Trento (Come si scrive una grande storia) e Giovanni Mauriello (Latte Creative e Minerva). Tra talk inspirational, case studies e workshop…

❤3

1 Jun 2023, 10:46 UTC108 viewsread 10 August 2026

SAY A.I. TO THE FUTURE È in corso una grande rivoluzione industriale e culturale. Il boom delle intelligenze artificiali generative è iniziato, e non si fermerà. Tutto è in trasformazione, dal processo creativo, al rapporto con l’informazione, a quasi ogni ambito del lavoro terziario. Per questo motivo abbiamo immaginato con Claudio Riccio un corso denso e approfondito per comprendere meglio il mondo delle AI sotto d…

26 May 2023, 10:18 UTC88 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Come funziona l'intelligenza artificiale text to image? Che rischi presenta per il nostro rapporto con l'informazione? Ne parla il nostro creative strategist Claudio Riccio in un'intervista per ANSA, realizzata da Cecilia Ferrara. 👉https://www.ansa.it/sito/videogallery/economia/2023/05/25/intelligenza-artificiale-lesperto-ecco-come-funziona-midjourney_e254f766-0b71-403f-9d33-3283e3357e77.html

🔥3

26 May 2023, 07:24 UTC73 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Secondo una ricerca made in USA (University of Texas Arlington e University of Colorado Riverside) ogni query a Chat GPT consuma 500ml d’acqua. Moltiplichiamo questo dato per il numero di utenti che ogni giorno che lo utilizza... Otteniamo dati preoccupanti (anche se non sorprendenti). L'addestramento di Chat GPT-3 ad esempio ha consumato ben 700.000 litri d'acqua. Qui maggiori info https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03271…

19 May 2023, 06:51 UTC76 viewsread 10 August 2026

Dopo Sundar Pichai, anche Sam Altman, il CEO di OpenAI, [ChatGPT] si unisce al coro di chi lancia l'allarme sui grandi rischi che comporta l'intelligenza artificiale. Ma questa incredibile rivoluzione industriale e culturale non si sta realizzando per mano delle macchine. Viene portata avanti dalle bigh tech proprio approfittando del vuoto di quella regolamentazione ora invocata (scommettendo che non avverrà). https:…

17 May 2023, 09:38 UTCviews —

Comunicazione per l'impatto sociale pinned «🔥 Il canale dedicato alla comunicazione per l'impatto sociale! Come dare forza ai messaggi delle battaglie per i diritti, la giustizia ambientale e ai progetti solidali? Qual è il confine tra il brand activism e un'operazione di washing? Cos'è il linguaggio…»

17 May 2023, 09:36 UTC74 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔥 Il canale dedicato alla comunicazione per l'impatto sociale! Come dare forza ai messaggi delle battaglie per i diritti, la giustizia ambientale e ai progetti solidali? Qual è il confine tra il brand activism e un'operazione di washing? Cos'è il linguaggio ampio e in che modo possiamo scrivere in modo non escludente? Quali sono le più interessanti idee comunicative in circolazione da cui trarre ispirazione? E quali …

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @latteschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Comunicazione per l'impatto sociale” (@latteschool), 38 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/latteschool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.