Channel
@latropman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
393subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001362325457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @latropman |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/latropman |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 393 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 395 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 395 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,287 |
| Reactions total | 153 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
237 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 31.2% | |
| custom 5453878587767660028 | 48 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5253950553083375726 | 47 | 19.8% | |
| 🤯 | 28 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 7.59% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 5.49% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.11% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.422% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @latropman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqxJFKD4 | 1 | 31 July 2026 | 31 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Рандомный вброс посреди ночи: 10-часовая версия танца из видоса про индийское кино существует уже целых полгода, но по разным причинам ютится лишь в черновиках. Делайте или не делайте с этой инфой что хотите 🤷🏻♂️
custom 545387858776766002812🤯7
Signed vitalya
👆🏻Я просто обязан зафиксировать, что наша история из реплая получила-таки развитие! Если кто не помнит или вовсе не в теме, посмотрите там же видос, в котором Миша рассказывает детально, что произошло. Ну, а я просто жду теперь 12 августа!
❤6👍1🤔1
Signed vitalya
ЧУТОК О НЕЙРОНКАХ Что угодно несёт вред при неправильном подходе. А нейрослоп гарантирован только в тех случаях, когда вместо усложнённых детальных промтов пишут "сделай там ну шоб это... как его... красиво". С хорошей идеей, прописанным сценарием и грамотно поставленной задачей нейронка может стать таким же полезным инструментом, как любая программа для монтажа или создания 3д-графики. Раньше ж кино руками резали …
👍5⚡3❤1
Signed vitalya
Если верить нейронке, общее количество уникальных материалов вышло 282. Из них только фильмов - 171. Посему решил не засирать канал длиннопостами и собрал гугл-таблицу потаймкодово, чтобы желающим было проще ориентироваться при поиске. В листе "Таймкоды" три столбца: в первом, собственно, таймкоды вышедшего ролика, во втором - название содержания, а в третьем - таймкод этого самого содержания в оригинале. В нём они …
👍5🤩2❤1
Signed vitalya
Пока собирал этот видос, поймал несколько тревожек и пару неплохих скримеров от якутских киноделов. Как оказалось, думерских фильмов у нас более, чем дохрена: пока что я насчитал в папке 145 скачанных, но не все переименовывал. Думаю выйдет под 160 минимум. Завтра выложу весь список использованных. И вы там определённо найдёте для себя депресняковые алмазы. А теперь, пожалуй, редкое явление на моём андеграундовом ка…
❤12👍2🤔1
Signed vitalya
⚡️ Наконец-то, релизнулось! Случился очередной офигенский экспириенс по сборке того, в чём я вообще не шарю, но оказалось, что я почти все моменты подобрал как надо. Добавлю ещё, что Миша своим рассказом продал мне игру, хоть я и вряд ли залечу в неё когда-нибудь. Тем не менее, видос обязателен к просмотру! анкаты ко всему, что вышло и выйдет, получится намутить только в августе, щас надо оч усиленно доделать ещё од…
❤7custom 52539505530833757262
Signed vitalya
⚡️BREAKING NEWS от DAILY BUGLE: анонимный источник предоставил нашей редакции эксклюзивный материал, связанный с так называемым народным супергероем Человеком-пауком. Мы отсмотрели данный документальный фильм об этом подлом преступнике. Внимание: кадры не для слабонервных! Вот оно доказательство! Доказательство того, что Человек-паук... [смотреть далее]
❤10custom 52539505530833757263custom 54538785877676600282
Signed vitalya
Уот так уот получилось. Выйдет, скорее всего, сегодня. А прям после него ещё один, так что ушёл собирать дальше. хотя куда я ушёл, я же и так дома... а не вдали от него...
custom 545387858776766002812❤3🤩1
Signed vitalya
Ещё одна деталь из второго трейлера нового Человека-паука: в паре сцен были услышаны нотки, схожие с теми, что звучали в трейлере первого сезона Apex Legends, да и вообще главного апексового саундтрека. Эти синты в ревербе, напоминающие гидролокатор подлодки, почему-то любил всегда, а тут они добавляют какого-то веса, значимости и таинственности: есть в них что-то... глубинное. А если нахожу их в каких-нибудь песнях …
⚡9custom 54538785877676600281
Signed vitalya
САМТЫНГС КАМИНГ В Marvel начинается какая-то мрачнявая эпоха. Не в плохом смысле, а в настроенческом. Но если сравнивать трейлер нового Человека-Паука и трейлер будущих Мстителей, то первого я жду гораздо больше, чем вторых, где снова все встанут в кружок спиной друг к другу, чтобы сражаться с несоразмерными злодеусами злеями. Кароч, эпика безусловно валом, но пафоса больше.
custom 54538785877676600286⚡1❤1
Signed vitalya
Сколько раз смотрел «Мстители: Финал», но только сейчас заметил, что одна реплика на космолёте, вероятно, доснималась намного позже, так как в ней отличается вообще всё: оптика, крупность, освещение, цветкор и задники хромака (особенно по чёткости заметно за Старком). И есть ощущение, что их вообще снимали отдельно друг от друга, так как персы плавают в кадре неестественно. Прикол, конечно, как сюжет может захватить…
🤯18
Signed vitalya
Априори, уличные повара и слишком деловые подростки: долгожданная третья часть из списка «Что бесит Витальку». Пользуйтесь, если он задолжал вам видос или еще как-то балуется. Для тех, кто не в теме: у Витали довольно большой список того, что бесит, и в какой-то момент мы начали записывать в заметки: я пишу то, что бесит его, он — то, что бесит меня. Так набралось уже 34 пункта, предыдущие части здесь: — первая ч…
custom 52539505530833757267❤1
Signed D
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @latropman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 69,818 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Latropman” (@latropman), 393 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/latropman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.