Нежнятина 🌸 Лучи - 10-11-11-12-12-13-13-14(С 0.7) Основа - 1Д(С 0.1)
custom 53593113321244035514custom 54361810719452949894custom 53978780553833555523

Channel
@lashes_mlt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002705149848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lashes_mlt |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lashes_mlt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 144 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 146 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 146 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
159 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5359311332124403551 | 38 | 23.9% | |
| custom 5361889480733106268 | 20 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5361929222065494120 | 18 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5312558109141521622 | 17 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5436181071945294989 | 17 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5242692292749319929 | 12 | 7.55% | |
| 💔 | 10 | 6.29% | |
| custom 5312115912193624550 | 7 | 4.40% | |
| custom 5397878055383355552 | 7 | 4.40% | |
| custom 5435986724675149996 | 7 | 4.40% | |
| custom 5312538283572483165 | 6 | 3.77% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lashes_mlt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 March 2026 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Нежнятина 🌸 Лучи - 10-11-11-12-12-13-13-14(С 0.7) Основа - 1Д(С 0.1)
custom 53593113321244035514custom 54361810719452949894custom 53978780553833555523
Важная информация ℹ️ Дорогие девушки, я уезжаю в другой город до конца лета точно(хотя с ситуацией на сегодняшний день может все поменяться) так что выложила крайние окошки перед моим уездом(если вдруг будет все забито все равно пишите, возможно, получится подобрать окошко) Кто знает, я обучаюсь в университете, на случай если нам поставят очное обучение в сентябре то тогда придется вернутся и работать дальше (есть и …
💔10
Носка 1 месяц Заметьте что все лучи на месте)
custom 54361810719452949893
Посмотрите какую нежную медузу делала сегодня 1 фото - без закрепления 2 фото - с закреплением Очень нравится работать в тонком волокне, выглядит нежно и воздушно
custom 53618894807331062687custom 54361810719452949893custom 53978780553833555522custom 53121159121936245501
Девочки, я теперь есть в Максе ☺️
custom 53121159121936245504
🩷L изгиб 7-13 (2Д)
custom 53618894807331062686custom 53121159121936245502custom 53125581091415216222
Трендовый эффект с укладкой гелем 😲 3д(0.7) - 9-15 (D изгиб)
custom 53593113321244035516custom 53125581091415216224custom 54359867246751499962custom 53619292220654941201
Анимэ без закрепления - это вау 😲 Лучи конусные - 16-18-16 Основа С - 10-12-11 (4Д)
custom 53125581091415216224custom 53125382835724831653custom 53618894807331062682
#носка 1 месяц и 4 дня
custom 53593113321244035514custom 53978780553833555522custom 54359867246751499961
Я работаю в прежнем режиме(пока работает аккумулятор) может на недельку его хватит У кого есть интернет, оставьте свои номера мне, либо отпишитесь кто будет, а кто нет 🌸 Надеюсь скоро свет восстановится 🙏
#носка 3 недели
custom 53593113321244035514custom 53125581091415216222custom 54361810719452949892
🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 Лучи LC 0.07 - 10-14 Основа LB 0.07 - 8-12 🎀нижние ресницы
custom 53619292220654941206custom 54361810719452949895custom 53593113321244035512
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lashes_mlt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eli_lashes🧚🏼♀️” (@lashes_mlt), 144 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lashes_mlt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.