Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed H

Channel
@larrentsgrls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
265subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002791750701 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @larrentsgrls |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/larrentsgrls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 265 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 260 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 260 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (3 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,712 |
| Reactions total | 355 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
355 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 202 | 56.9% | |
| 👏 | 81 | 22.8% | |
| 🤯 | 72 | 20.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed H
این پیامو فور کنید مرامی و عشقی یه پست انتخاب کنید از چنلتون فور بزنم اینجا ویو بگیره.
Signed H
یا بعد از عکسبرداری توی هر لوکیشن رفتن لباس عوض کردن.🥹 کانسپتِ اینکه کلا چند دقیقه نشسته بودن اونجا توی فاصله و سکوت غذا خوردن تا فقط یکی ازشون فیلم بگیره، ولی بعد به خبرگذاریها پول دادن تا عکسای بیشتری با AI ازشون بسازه تا ثابت کنن که نه اینا وقت تنهایی بیشتری باهم گذروندن و همهی تیم هری مثل زامبی دنبال خودش و ابویسلی نامزدش راه نیفتادن.🙄
😭48
Signed H
فکر کنم اصل ماجرا همین بود دیگه، درکل تمام حرفم اگه بخواد توی یه جمله خلاصه بشه، اینه که واقعا نگران هریام.
😭53
Signed H
دیلیمیل اومده یه آرتیکل گذاشته درمورد اینکه هری و گویی رفتن ‘مینیپیکنیک’ و دارن خوش میگذرونن و بلا بلا بلا. بچهها ====))))). از عکسهای AI استفاده کردننننن!!! ببینید، تمام این عکسهایی که گذاشتمرو باهم مقایسه کنید، نوشتهی روی کلاه هری چرا شد پلیزینگ؟ چرا یهجا نوشته ناقصه یهجا کامل؟ چه بلایی سر تیشرت گویی و تتوهاش اومد؟ چرا یهجا هری و گویی توی انگشتاشون رینگ دارن و یهجای دیگه ندارن؟ چرا قیافههاشون این شکل…
😭52
Signed H
قبل از اینکه بریم سراغِ فاجعهی بعدی، این فاجعهرو هم ببینید. اصلا کاری به این ندارم که چرا صاحب این مغازه فیلم دوربینهای امنیتی مغازهشرو در اختیار مردم گذاشته (اصلاهم تیم هری ازش نخواسته و اصلاهم برنامهریزی شده نیست)، ولی خندهدارترین چیزیکه میتونید ببینید. گویی نوشیدنیشرو به هری میده تا امتحانش کنه، و همونطور که میبینید نوشیدنی توی لیوان اصلاااا از جاش تکونهم نمیخوره و حتی به لبهی لیوان و دهن هریهم ن…
😭43
Signed H
باهم به مکزیکو رسیدن، توی ویایپی باهم نشسته بودن، باهم رفتن توی پیت، باهم از شو خارج شدن، بیرون باهم دیده میشن، و الانهم توی یه هتل باهم میمونن!!! هتلی که اصلا معلوم نیست هریهم اونجا هست یا نه؟ که طبق صحبتهای کسایی که اونجا بودن و از کارکنان هتل پرسیدن، هری اونجا نیست و توی یه هتلِ دیگهست!!! ====))))). و حدس بزنید چی؟ جف رسما یکنفر رو استخدام کرده تا جلوشون قرار بگیره و عکسهایی با کیفیت فولاچدی ازشون ت…
🤯35
Signed H
و میدونید قسمتِ جالب ماجرا کجاست؟ اینکه گویی اصلا قرار نبوده توی شوهای مکزیکو کنار هری باشه. و هری حتی نمیدونسته که گویی قراره سروکلهش پیدا بشهو استانت داشته باشن. حالا حدس میزدید گویی این مدت کجا و با کی بوده؟ بله، با جف. توی انگلیس و تعطیلات. بچهها، این قضیهی جف و گوییرو یادتونه؟ جدیتر از اون چیزیئه که فکر میکنید ===))). اینا باهم تعطیلات بودن، و جف با یه جت شخصی با گویی رسیدن مکزیکو. در ادامه بیشتر نشو…
🤯37😭2
Signed H
بعدش یه عکس از هری داشتیم که ‘تنها’ بود و دوباره بعدترش، یه عکسِ دیگه از هری، گویی، جف، تامی، و کلا زامبیهای همیشگی داشتیم. هری تنهایی، رفت به محلِ استانت تا ازشون عکسبرداری بشه. عاشق وقتاییام که این اتفاق میافته.
👏41
Signed H
خب اول با این شروع کنیم که زمانیکه هری توی برزیل شو داشت، تنها اونجا بود و خبری از زامبیهای همیشگی (جف، گویی، تامی) نبود، فقط برد همراهش بود. بعدش که اجراهای مکزیکو شروع شدنهم، هری خودش تنهایی به مکزیکو رسید و بازم کسی همراهش نبود. اما یهویی سروکلهی جف و گویی ‘باهم’ پیدا شد و هردوتاشون باهم به مکزیکو رسیدن.
👏40😭4
Signed H
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @larrentsgrls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 756,673 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لرِنتـزگرل.” (@larrentsgrls), 265 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/larrentsgrls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.