Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ларонне читает

Channel

Ларонне читает

@laronnereading

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

345subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001720051145
TypeChannel
Username@laronnereading
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/laronnereading

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3453553506 August 2026 — 355 subscribers6 August 2026 — 355 subscribers14 August 2026 — 349 subscribers28 August 2026 — 348 subscribers5 September 2026 — 347 subscribers14 September 2026 — 345 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 344–357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 06:00345-2
5 Sept 2026, 17:59347-1
28 Aug 2026, 23:54348-1
14 Aug 2026, 18:05349-6
6 Aug 2026, 21:04355no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:51355first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53571235573882193635935.1%
custom 53573294581203885174627.4%
custom 53596582237480163132112.5%
🔥1710.1%
custom 5357533722470021282137.74%
😍127.14%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @laronnereading. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC11 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 День 12 Ребекка Яррос «Ониксовый шторм» (Эмпирей #3) 385 / 765 Медленно, но верно я продвигаюсь) Не могу сказать ничего нового, кроме того, что у Яррос есть талант писать батальные сцены и создавать напряжение) Поэтому сегодня просто рассматриваем коллажи и продолжаем читать) #77страницчеллендж

custom 53571235573882193632custom 53573294581203885171custom 53596582237480163131

6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC22 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53573294581203885177custom 53571235573882193634🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 День 11 Эмма Скотт "The Muse" 112 / 317 Есть моменты, когда история вдруг перестаёт быть просто историей — и ты физически чувствуешь, как между героями натягивается нерв. Вот у меня сейчас в книге тот самый момент. А ещё — этот контраст между тем, кто прячет боль за колкостью, и тем, кто видит сквозь эту броню и всё равно остаётся рядом. Я читала и физически ощущала, как трещит защита героев, страница за стр

custom 53573294581203885172

5 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC37 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53573294581203885178custom 53571235573882193634custom 53575337224700212824

4 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC41 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 День 10 Ребекка Яррос «Ониксовый шторм» (Эмпирей #3) 308 / 765 Вот мне безумно нравится, как Яррос описывает батальные сцены или тайные вылазки. Она способна написать потрясающий боевик и драйв ее книги зажигает мое сердце. Но. Есть моменты передышки, в которых она просто повторяет по 10 раз одну и ту же информацию, одни и те же разговоры, одни и те же поступки персонажей. И это скучно. Вот так я и читаю, то

custom 53573294581203885177custom 53571235573882193635custom 53596582237480163134

4 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC38 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#отзывнакнигу о волках, которые становятся семьей, революции против целого мира и доме, который иногда оказывается вовсе не местом… «Волки ночью воют» — Алекс Данте 🐺 Сюжет Я закрыла эту историю с очень странным ощущением. Будто попрощалась не столько с книгой, сколько с людьми, с которыми прожила несколько лет. «Волки ночью воют» — это городское фэнтези, где за борьбой Света и Тени скрывается история о выборе,

🔥7custom 53571235573882193635custom 53573294581203885172

3 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC38 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 День 9 Ребекка Яррос «Ониксовый шторм» (Эмпирей #3) 231 / 765 Вот интересно, как Яррос драматизирует и накаляет обстановку на ровном месте. Например я трижды вывихала коленную чашечку и как-то не умирала от боли, как Вайолет) ну да ладно) Сюжет идет бодро! Мне очень нравится динамика Эмпиреев, тут много событий, драйва и драмы, конечно. #77страницчеллендж

custom 53575337224700212827custom 53573294581203885174custom 53571235573882193633

3 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC39 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍9custom 53571235573882193634custom 53573294581203885172

2 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC40 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 День 8 🤩 Саша Пэйтон Смитт «Розовая сделка» 98 / 403 страниц Знаете это правило некоторых книг — нужно прожить первые 100 страниц, и дальше будет круто? «Розовая сделка» именно такая. Первые 7-8 глав было мило и интересно, но сейчас я хихикаю и вздыхаю буквально на каждой странице! И вот в чём кайф: любовный треугольник здесь совсем не по привычной схеме. Обычно там кто-то уже влюблён и кто-то мучается. А тут

custom 53596582237480163138custom 53571235573882193633custom 53575337224700212822

2 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC37 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 День 7 Эмма Скотт "The Muse" 98 / 317 🤩 Лайфхак для чтения на английском, который реально ускорил мой процесс Нашла для себя еще один способ читать книги в оригинале — делюсь, вдруг пригодится: 1️⃣ Сначала слушаю аудиокнигу. На слух ловлю где-то 70-80% — сюжет, диалоги, общий смысл — но многие детали и нюансы проскакивают мимо. 2️⃣ Потом читаю тот же кусок текста глазами. То, что уже поняла на слух, пробегаю

🔥7custom 53571235573882193633custom 53573294581203885172

2 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC33 views13 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 Все, всем читать! Там такой огонь, пожар начался! Я в востоге) Не смогла вас оставить с такой концовкой 9ой главы и поэтому там буквально пара абзацев из 10ой) Напоминаю, как удобнее всего следить за приключениями: 🌹 Boosty — без впн и лучший способ поддержать меня) Здесь я уже перевожу 11-ую главу. Текст выходит часто, небольшими порциями. А еще подписчикам доступны файлы epub, с иллюстрациями и

custom 53571235573882193637custom 53573294581203885174custom 53596582237480163132

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @laronnereading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ларонне читает” (@laronnereading), 345 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laronnereading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.