Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

larared

@lararedart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

439subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001905624090
TypeChannel
Username@lararedart
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 December 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lararedart

Growth

4397 Aug 2026, 03:18 — 439 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:20 — 439 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:187 Aug 2026, 14:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 438–440 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 14:20439no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:18439first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.3%
avg views ÷ 439 subscribers
Avg views / post
238
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held12 (10 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,192
Reactions total157
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

400 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13934.8%
❤‍🔥10426.0%
🥰5714.2%
🔥399.75%
🤩225.50%
💘153.75%
💋71.75%
🍓51.25%
custom 537077472009650979130.75%
🆒30.75%
custom 538413753588047084420.5%
🌭20.5%
👍20.5%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lararedart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC194 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пачка субботних человекоскетчей х) В один из стадиков я чет немного упоролась, и он вышел из-под контроля 😳 это я - смотрю на количество просмотров и сердечек под постом с Дотторе и пичалюсь #скетч #стадик

🔥166🥰6❤‍🔥2🌭2custom 53707747200965097912custom 53841375358804708442

31 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC130 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня тут для вас два Дотторе на выбор - дневной и ночной 😏 (это я снова намекаю картинкой для какого зина сейчас рисую) Краткий апдейт по зинам: 🌒Зуко зин и Дотторе зин рисуются, будут арты и мерч (во втором мерч пока под вопросом); 🌒Калеб зин, к сожалению, отменили из-за скандала в игре :с но арт я дорисую обязательно, чуть попозже; 🌒зато я влезла в Валко зин, так что будет еще арт с волчонком :з 🌒подалась в ещё

❤‍🔥17💘6🥰4custom 53707747200965097911

25 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC203 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Поскетчиваю тут немножко для @zukozine :з Пришлось вспомнить детство и пересмотреть аватара, чтобы освежить память 😳 Каюсь, и новую слитую полнометражку тоже посмотрела - какие там красивые фоны, божимой 😍 #zukozine_wip #зиновое #zuko

❤‍🔥18🔥6🤩6

23 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC313 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Притащила обещанные закладки 🤪 На самом деле это одна двусторонняя закладка - как-то у меня оба скетча получились удачными, и удалось использовать оба :з Вообще я не большой профи по чиби, так что пришлось немного попыхтеть, но мне нравится, что вышло 🙂 #зиновое #Bleach_zine_2026 #bleach #Byakuya_kuchiki #chibi

🥰17💘6❤‍🔥41

20 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC352 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А смотрите, что я вам принеслаа! 🙂 (я воскресла, да 😳) Открыточки с Бьякуей, наконец, могу вам показать, а сам зин с мерчем уже можно предзаказать (ссылку положу в комменты) :з Нетерпеливо потираю лапки, сама скорей хочу пощупать 😍 Чуть попозже принесу вам закладки с чибиками посмотреть :з #зиновое #Bleach_zine_2026 #bleach #byakuya_kuchiki

🥰16❤‍🔥108💘1

5 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC472 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На фоне волнений в lads сегодня у нас волкомальчиковое х) апд. совсем забыла сказать, что ещё у нас на горизонте Зуко зин! Вухуу! 🙂 В планах два арта: обычный и 18+ 😏 #lads #valko

22❤‍🔥10🥰5💘1

1 Jul 2026, 06:06 UTC905 views40 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто впопыхах сдал работу в зин, тот я х) Таак хочется вам целиком показать картиночку, но пока вот вам кусочек Се Ляня 🙂 #wip_tgcf_fanzine #hualian #tgcf #зиновое

22🔥7🥰5❤‍🔥3💋2💘1

26 Jun 2026, 14:23 UTC912 views34 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пятничные спойлерсы по хуаляням вам принесла :з #wip_tgcf_fanzine #hualian #tgcf #зиновое

20❤‍🔥9💋5

22 Jun 2026, 18:13 UTC468 views39 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это я вам без слов намекаю на то, какой зин следующий, и кого я в него рисую 😏 #скетч #wip #lads #зиновое

23❤‍🔥8🔥4🥰4

18 Jun 2026, 17:20 UTC449 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Принесла вам стадики на цвет :з Смешными я их назвала из-за этой нелепой птицы и смешной выдры (наверное это выдра :D) А мишка.. мишка просто был сложный х) Стадили примерно по 30 минут каждую картинку, но мишку и выдру я потом ещё чуть докрутила по контрасту и деталям. Короче, вывод таков - скетчить мужиков мне нравится больше 🤣 надо чаще тренировать цвет 😳 #стадик

17❤‍🔥8🔥6

14 Jun 2026, 19:54 UTC468 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Воскресные мужчинские скетчи! 🤪 На подтяжечном я прям покряхтела 😳 Снова порисовали онлайн, на этот раз прям сильно продуктивнее - у меня еще есть смешные стадики на цвет, занесу вам их позже :з #стадик #скетч

13❤‍🔥9🍓5👍2

10 Jun 2026, 14:08 UTC329 views32 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сидит/лежит/отмокает, ждет свой днерожденевый подарок 😏 (я все еще треню мужицкие торсы, если вы вдруг забыли, да :D) А вообще я случайно узнала вчера о дне рождения Хуа Чэна и неожиданно для себя ультанула, на ночь глядя х) Прокрастинация - дело такое х_х но я не жалуюсь, вроде хороший Хуа вышел 🖤 #tgcf #фанарт #hua_cheng

🤩167❤‍🔥6🆒3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @lararedart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 523,965 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“larared” (@lararedart), 439 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lararedart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.