Channel
@lara_krouts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
96subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001950222292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lara_krouts |
| Description | R'n'B артистка с хип-хоп бэкграундом родом из Тюмени. Пишу музыку с 2012 года, исследую современный звук, живу в Мск и рассказываю о своём пути во всех соцсетях: lara_krouts предложения: @anastasilara MELLOW RAP: https://band.link/mellowraplarakrouts |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lara_krouts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 96 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 96 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
194 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377762498743116673 | 54 | 27.8% | |
| 💋 | 49 | 25.3% | |
| custom 5300957342345481893 | 39 | 20.1% | |
| custom 5357352955886453736 | 37 | 19.1% | |
| custom 5409289431301508894 | 15 | 7.73% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎵 Меланхолия, страсть и бездна чувств — влюбились в искренность обновлённой Шкатулки Lara Krouts · антитеза · REFLECT AFTER DARK · bollywoodFM · Juzeppe Junior · Плавник Какой релиз оказался для вас настоящим сокровищем?
custom 53777624987431166739custom 53573529558864537365custom 54092894313015088945custom 53009573423454818932
😎😎😎
Смотрите, с Деном лайв записали! Красиво получилось ❤️
custom 537776249874311667310💋7custom 53009573423454818935custom 53573529558864537362
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53573529558864537369💋2custom 54092894313015088942
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53009573423454818935custom 53573529558864537364💋1
Сходили на Пикник Афиши! 😍 Мой топ: Куок и Дмитрий Маликов
custom 53009573423454818935💋4custom 53777624987431166733custom 53573529558864537361
🖤
custom 537776249874311667315💋6custom 53573529558864537366custom 54092894313015088943custom 53009573423454818932
Смотрите, как красиво! катались всю ночь по Москве, застали рассвет Мой любимый трек с альбома «Яркая Москва» и такое вайбовое видео
💋10custom 53009573423454818937custom 53573529558864537366
Ну что сказать, ну что сказать, устроены так люди, что после серьезного релиза или дела случается откат 😂 Я не исключение, хотя мб у кого-то наоборот еще больше сил появляется. Надо выжимать из себя по максимуму, чтобы продолжать постить, активничать. А хочется просто на даче кормить комаров, есть жимолость и мамины оладьи. Лайв-версии двух треков планируем снять на этой недели: под фоно, под гитару. А еще надо п…
custom 537776249874311667310💋5custom 54092894313015088945custom 53009573423454818933
Нежное и красивое mood видео на трек «Жилет»
💋14custom 530095734234548189310custom 53777624987431166737custom 53573529558864537364
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lara_krouts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 559,801 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lara Krouts включи, пжл” (@lara_krouts), 96 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lara_krouts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.