Channel
@laquimeradegupta
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
222subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001378561693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @laquimeradegupta |
| Created | 27 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/laquimeradegupta |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 222 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 223 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 223 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 July 2025 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 55 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
25 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 32.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 8.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
¿Por qué unos organismos viven décadas y otros apenas unos meses? Peter Godfrey-Smith, en ‘Otras mentes’, responde apelando a una tradición teórica que arranca en Medawar y culmina en Hamilton. Pero ¿es esa respuesta suficiente? Al recorrer la evidencia empírica, descubrimos que la teoría deja demasiados cabos sueltos. 👇👇 ¿POR QUÉ NO VIVIMOS TODOS MÁS TIEMPO?
👍2
Signed Álvaro
¿Qué tienen en común un átomo de uranio, un virus gigante y una ballena azul? Que son raros. Muy raros. De hecho, la naturaleza sigue un patrón matemático implacable: lo pequeño abunda, lo grande es excepción. En este artículo, desmontamos el mito del progreso y descubrimos por qué la complejidad es, sencillamente, difícil de alcanzar. ¿Quieres saber por qué? 👇👇 LA NATURALEZA ODIA LA COMPLEJIDAD
❤4
Signed Álvaro
⚫️ LA PARADOJA DE JEVONS ⚫️ ¿Os acordáis de que este señor iba a curar el cáncer de páncreas y que el gobierno español era muy malo por no darle la pasta que quería? Pues leed este artículo que resumen la última semana ¿Qué ha ocurrido con su investigación?, ¿qué relación tiene Barbacid con el enorme presunto caso de corrupción que se está descubriendo en el CNIO?, ¿habían imágenes manipuladas en la publicación de …
Signed Álvaro
Las tecnologías en torno a la producción de energía tienen consecuencias sociales y ambientales muy importantes. El debate es agrio y los mitos numerosos. He querido brevemente exponer mi visión sobre este espinoso asunto: https://cienciamundana.wordpress.com/2026/04/30/3-tecnologias-ocultas-el-cuello-de-botella-energetico/
Signed Álvaro
🟢 LA QUIMERA DE GUPTA 🟢 Hace 5 años publiqué unas entradas en el blog sobre termodinámica y el llamado diezmo ecológico o regla del 10% He añadido unas conclusiones y lo he unificado todo un mismo texto. A ver qué os parece ¿Qué es, en ecología, la regla del 10% y porqué si comes todos los días filete debes conocerla?, ¿qué límites ecológicos establece?, ¿por qué algunos organismos han decidido saltársela? Una fo…
👍4
Signed Álvaro
Cualquiera de nosotros, cada día, come, bebe y respira con la tranquilidad no-consciente de que no nos intoxicaremos. Confiamos tanto en el sistema que ni pensamos que al abrir una botella, en su contenido pueda haber sustancias peligrosas para nuestra salud. ¿Qué es lo que permite esto? ¿Cómo de frágil es? Tecnologías ocultas II - HPLC
👍2
Signed Álvaro
¿Qué te viene a la cabeza cuando oyes la palabra tecnología? La mayoría de las tecnologías que condicionan nuestro estilo de vida pasan totalmente desapercibidas y a menudo tienen serios problemas de fragilidad o de injusticias. Voy a ir publicando artículos cortitos al respecto. La primera, el proceso Haber-Bosch.
Signed Álvaro
INFORME GLIFOSATO Hoy en Radio Klara me han entrevistado para hablar de los reglamentos ómnibus que prepara la Comisión Europea en asuntos como la regulación de las nuevas técnicas genéticas (organismos modificados genéticamente, vaya), pesticidas y cosmeticos. Hemos aprovechado también para hablar del "Informe glifosato" y de cómo estas nuevas regulaciones van a afectar a la legalidad del glifosato y otros pestici…
Signed Álvaro
Channel photo updated
🔴LA QUIMERA DE GUPTA🔴 Nueva entrada en el Blog sobre evolución de los virus y sobre lo que nos enseñan sibre cómo evoluciona la vida 🔗https://open.substack.com/pub/laquimeradegupta/p/de-johan-cruiff-al-sputnik?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=7w2rmt
Signed Álvaro
Biología Popular pinned «LIBRO Parece que Telegram considera un libro sobre el #Glifosato spam y ha borrado los últimos mensajes. Lo volvemos a intentar 🔴 BEAKING NEWS Ya está DISPONIBLE📚 INFORME GLIFOSATO: Cómo el glifosato ha inundado la biosfera y está contribuyendo a…»
LIBRO Parece que Telegram considera un libro sobre el #Glifosato spam y ha borrado los últimos mensajes. Lo volvemos a intentar 🔴 BEAKING NEWS Ya está DISPONIBLE📚 INFORME GLIFOSATO: Cómo el glifosato ha inundado la biosfera y está contribuyendo a la crisis de biodiversidad y a la pérdida de esperanza de vida humana Publicado en Libros en Acción @ecologistas AQUÍ 🔗 https://tienda.ecologistasenaccion.org/home/3…
🔥2
Signed Álvaro
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @laquimeradegupta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Biología Popular” (@laquimeradegupta), 222 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laquimeradegupta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.