Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ляпа

@lapvsesvit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003601390882
TypeChannel
Username@lapvsesvit
DescriptionПривєта! Я ляпа ну і я косплеєр. Свій шлях я почала в 24 році але активно почала розвиватись тільки в 25!! Мені важлива ваша підтримка — вона дає мотивацію!!!) Анон:https://t.me/anonymousnovalentinebot?start=1960459926
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lapvsesvit

Growth

469 Aug 2026, 21:46 — 46 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:01 — 46 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:4610 Aug 2026, 14:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:0146no change
9 Aug 2026, 21:4646first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.8%
avg views ÷ 46 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.3
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held9 (5 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total290
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
688
Videos
25
Links
139

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓753.8%
🤨323.1%
215.4%
💋17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @TaniomiiPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #cosplay #реакції #репост #kitagawa

🍓1

9 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Відкриваю збір на цього чудового хлопчика, Soshiro Hoshina! 🙂 Дуже хочу зробити його, але самостійно зібрати всю суму зараз трохи складно 😭 Тому буду дуже вдячна кожному, хто захоче мене підтримати! 🥰🥳 Збір: 20/1000грн Посилання: https://www.privat24.ua/send/46gv9 Звісно, підтримка лише за бажанням! Я підготовлю подаруночки тим хто задонатить від 100грн)(і на фестивалі віддам) Також буду дуже вдячна за репостики

🍓2

9 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Почала дивитись нову анімешку, вже з'явилися 2 любімчіка..воно прям дуже зашло мені

🍓3

8 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @rinamiriPhoto

🥀𝕭𝖊𝖑𝖆 𝕯𝖎𝖒𝖎𝖙𝖗𝖊𝖘𝖈𝖚💋 ꃅꍏꃅꍏ, ꀤ꓄'ꌗ ꌃꍟꍟꈤ ꍏ ꅏꃅꀤ꒒ꍟ ꌗꀤꈤꉓꍟ ꀤ'ꃴꍟ ꉓꀎ꓄ ꂵꍟꈤ ꂦꉣꍟꈤ... ꀤ'꒒꒒ ꃅꍏꈤꁅ ꌩꂦꀎ, ꉓꀎ꓄ ꌩꂦꀎꋪ ꓄ꃅꋪꂦꍏ꓄ ꂦꉣꍟꈤ ꍏꈤꀸ ꅏꍏ꓄ꉓꃅ 𝖄𝖊𝖘 𝖒𝖔𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖗~ Буду вдячна реакціям й репостам,не проти м'ю🫶♥️

1

7 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @kuracosPhoto

☹️🥸🫶🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🤩🪦 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🫥 🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🪦 😬👩‍❤️‍👨🙈🤩🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 🤍🤩𝑫𝒐 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒇𝒂𝒗𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒍𝒍 𝒘𝒂𝒔? 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒂 𝒇𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅 𝒐𝒇 𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒔. 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒖𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒊𝒄. 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒎𝒆 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒊𝒄 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒕, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕’𝒔 𝒘𝒉𝒚 𝒔𝒉𝒆 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒍𝒚 𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒃𝒆 𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒏 𝒊𝒕. 🪦🤩🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 🪦🪦🪦🤩𝚂𝚞𝚙𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝🔥🪦🪦🪦 😎• #Frieren #FrierenBeyondJourneysEnd #cosplay #kuracos •🤩 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦react/repost?🪦🪦 🪦𝘗𝘩𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳🪦🪦🪦🥹 🪦🪦💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙🪦🪦

🍓1

5 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @killianianannPhoto

🖤🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🖤 δy Лᥙᥴᥙчκᥲ Кі᧘᧘іᥲн 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞 🩸 Бути підписаним на наші канали: Кілліан та Лисичка 🧡Репост цього допису до себе (якщо канал приватний, надішліть скріншот з репостом) 🫀Написати про свою творчість в коментарі та прикріпити максимум 5 фото 🖤Чутливий контент під спойлер 🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞 💐Ведення каналу російською і/або зв'язок із сусідом-агресором

1

5 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Narii_NariPhoto

💫💫💫🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 💫💫🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 💫💫🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 —𐌵siᥒg "Eyᥱ ᧐f Ᏽ᧐ɗ" is frᥱᥱ. 𐋏᧐ᥕᥱ᥎ᥱr, ᴛɦᥱ ᥎ᥱry ᴛɦiᥒg ᴛɦᥲᴛ ᥴᥲrriᥱs ᥒ᧐ ᧐δ᥎i᧐ᥙs ρriᥴᥱ ᴛᥲg ᧐fᴛᥱᥒ ρr᧐᥎ᥱs ᴛ᧐ δᥱ ᴛɦᥱ ⲙ᧐sᴛ ᥱ᥊ρᥱᥒsi᥎ᥱ ᥕɦᥱᥒ ᴛɦᥱ ᴛiⲙᥱ ᥴ᧐ⲙᥱs ᴛ᧐ ρᥲy ᴛɦᥱ δiᥣᥣ. 💫💫💫💫🌟🌟🌟🌟 💫💫💫💫💫Kinich 🗿 💫💫💫💫🗿Clorinde Repost? #Kinich #Clorinde #cosplay

🤨3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @lapvsesvit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 456,478 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ляпа” (@lapvsesvit), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lapvsesvit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.