Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

СВЕТ в моей жизни | Ксения Ланикина

@lanikinalight

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

243subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003440127372
TypeChannel
Username@lanikinalight
DescriptionСветодизайн изнутри Опыт, проекты и профессиональные наблюдения о свете, удачные решения, ошибки, нестандартные запросы и рабочие приёмы Направления моих работ: https://t.me/yarkolightingstudio https://t.me/chaykalighting Для связи @xu_lan
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lanikinalight

Growth

2436 Aug 2026, 15:05 — 243 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:32 — 243 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:057 Aug 2026, 02:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 242–244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:32243no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:05243first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.3%
avg views ÷ 243 subscribers
Avg views / post
130
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held8 (24 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,037
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
168
Videos
10
Links
34

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

110 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6660.0%
🔥1917.3%
👍1210.9%
76.36%
👌21.82%
🤩21.82%
😁10.909%
😍10.909%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC79 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Варианты схем для создания «вечернего» света: 1. Потолочный светильник (любого типа монтажа) - с широкой оптикой, НО направлен на нижнюю часть стены. Цветность 2700 и ниже. Не бойтесь использовать супер теплые тона - 2400, 2200, 1900К. Для вечера они создают бархатный глубокий тон. 2. Всеми любимые торшеры. Лампа - с бронзовым напылением. 3. Любой настольная декоративный светильник с правильной лампой. ВАЖНО! Бра

9👍6🔥5

4 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC79 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Для отрисовки пространства и создания нужного настроения важно сочетание как цветовой температуры, так и направления света. Например, чтобы сделать пространство светлым, лёгким и объёмным, нужно имитировать естественный дневной свет: для этого направьте свет на верхнюю часть стены. Цветовая температура — 3000,3500,4000 К. Для вечернего света и атмосферы заката цветовая температура, естественно, ниже — 2700 К и ниже.

5🔥3😁1😍1

30 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC126 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обсудили в комментах почему верхний свет не может являться имитацией естественного света из окна. Кому интересно - присоединяйтесь к беседе. Продолжим

8

28 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC132 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#световыесхемы Наблюдение за природой, за естественным освещением даёт нам примеры конкретных световых решений. Всё, что нужно, — быть внимательным и повторить их с учётом особенностей интерьера и тех инструментов, которыми мы располагаем. Например, давайте проанализируем эти два фото. На первом — интерьер в естественном дневном свете. На втором - закатный свет. Вопросы, которые можно/нужно себе задать при анализе

🔥42🤩2

24 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC174 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, у нас с командой CHAYKA вот что получилось - 97(!) оттенков цвета. И каждый в трех тональностях.

87👌2

24 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC162 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Закаты — это то, что меня всегда вдохновляло. (И не только меня.) Оказывается, есть доказанный факт, что наблюдение закатного неба назначают как поддержку при депрессиях. Но главное — закаты — это невероятный сериал от природы. И каждый день абсолютно новая серия. Нет ни одного заката, который бы повторился. Этот удивительный факт уникальности каждого мгновения меня завораживает. Я мечтаю (и верю в свою мечту), что

12👍5🔥5

24 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC145 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Название происходит от фамилии учёного — лорда Рэлея (John William Strutt, 3rd Baron Rayleigh), английского физика, который в 1871 году математически описал этот механизм рассеяния света. Несколько фактов о нём: • Полное имя — Джон Уильям Стретт, третий барон Рэлей (титул унаследовал от отца) • В 1904 году получил Нобелевскую премию по физике — за открытие аргона (совместно с Уильямом Рамзаем) • Кроме рассеяния

10

24 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC140 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Меня всегда интересовал вопрос: почему днём цвет света голубовато-белый (не цвет небосвода, а именно свет, который падает на поверхность земли), а вечером — розово-оранжевый? Оказывается, всё дело в рэлеевском рассеянии. Механизм следующий: днём путь солнечного света через атмосферу короткий, и коротковолновая (синяя) часть спектра рассеивается молекулами воздуха во всех направлениях — именно поэтому небо голубое. Н

12🔥2👍1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lanikinalight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 523,369 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СВЕТ в моей жизни | Ксения Ланикина” (@lanikinalight), 243 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lanikinalight.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.