Channel
@langbaobaoguang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
265subscribers
+90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003986247401 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @langbaobaoguang |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 24 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/langbaobaoguang |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 265 | +20 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 245 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 235 | +16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 219 | +18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 201 | +25 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 176 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 176 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 175 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【真实悔过自述 知道错了 老哥们】 我曾经以为，赌博是运气，是捷径，是可以让我轻松翻身、快速赚钱的路子。直到我一次次输光、一次次崩溃，我才彻底明白：赌博从来不是赢运气，是赢人性，赢贪心，最后赢走你所有的一切。 最开始我只是抱着玩玩的心态，想着小赌怡情，赢一点就收手。刚开始确实赢过一点小钱，那短暂的甜头彻底勾走了我的理智。我开始膨胀，觉得自己运气好、能拿捏节奏，以为自己可以靠赌博改变生活、填补压力、轻松赚钱。 可从我贪心变大的那一刻起，噩梦就开始了。 赢的时候我舍不得停，总想着再多赢一点；输的时候又不甘心，一心想着回本、翻本。就是这两个念头，把我一步步拖进深渊。我开始越下越大，越输越急，越急越上头。脑子不再清醒，眼里只剩下输赢，完全看不清背后的陷阱。 短短一段时间，我把自己辛苦攒的积蓄全部输光。不够，就透支、就周转，抱着“下一把一定翻盘”的幻觉，一次次给自己希望，又一次次被现实狠狠打碎。 我见过凌晨两三点的屏幕，见过一次次充值后的…
👎1😢1
到处打广告注册送彩金，赢了钱就以设备异常为理由不给出款要求换设备提现 实际上是盗U平台 平台地址http://atm80.com
多多28 人头费必黑 搜索一下很多案例了 大舞台也能看见黑的不止一个人啊黑了一群 奖是没有的人头是不给的 充了一千跟我说没到要求闪客 25-31号 1-3号都一直在充
382833.vip。 黑款平台
这个 大发娱乐。搞个假平台骗口令红包的，红了不让提 让别人发口令
皇马体育 充200体育过关打到4000多不给出款 说违规
❤1
一百多块都拉黑。JLLPGbot
👏1
黑台，只能充值不给提现，推广极其嚣张，给你提现我吃什么 网站：LG.GD
❤1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @langbaobaoguang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“黑平台曝光” (@langbaobaoguang), 265 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/langbaobaoguang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.