Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lana_in_perfumeland

Channel

Lana_in_perfumeland

@lana_in_perfumeland

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

884subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001698285203
TypeChannel
Username@lana_in_perfumeland
Created12 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lana_in_perfumeland

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

881886883.57 August 2026 — 884 subscribers8 August 2026 — 884 subscribers15 August 2026 — 886 subscribers24 August 2026 — 885 subscribers31 August 2026 — 881 subscribers9 September 2026 — 883 subscribers15 September 2026 — 884 subscribers8847 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 880–887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 21:42884+1
9 Sept 2026, 05:56883+2
31 Aug 2026, 06:42881-4
24 Aug 2026, 03:14885-1
15 Aug 2026, 15:13886+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:06884no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:53884first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10862.1%
🔥2715.5%
😍137.47%
✍84.60%
🐳42.30%
👍42.30%
💘42.30%
🥰42.30%
👏21.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC47 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спонтанно купила Сценаристку Светланы Павловой - просто увидела в рекомендациях и быстро заказала) Во-первых, хотелось современную русскую… прозу?) возможно) Во-вторых, тема не избитая - ВИЧ и простая, неприукрашенная жизнь. Отношения между мужчиной и женщиной в наши дни. Мне понравилось - слог легкий, хлёсткий, вызывает интерес и эмоции, разные))) Герои получились одновременно слишком вычурными и в то же время на…

❤3👍2

4 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC89 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В Кремле цветут розы, прячутся павлины и величественно взирают с высоты фрески собора 🤩

❤8

3 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC107 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня провела день в Fondentarancio, BOIS 1920 ❤️ Знатная гурманика, которая все же остается парфюмерией - ведь очень реалистичному шоколаду с апельсином аккомпанируют жасмин, мускус, пачули. Это красиво и радостно, словно фейерверки на день города в конце лета; это понятно и комплиментарно ❤️ Мало слышу о нем от других, а сама уже второй отливант снашиваю в попытке понять - нужен флакон? Или да?))) 🍫

🔥8❤4

29 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC153 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, сегодня будет 1 рекомендация и 1 анти-рекомендация 😉 А могло бы быть все лучше…) Итак, начну с того, что не понравилось, хотя ожидания были самые радужные) Кофейня Press Concept - обещали авторский кофе по мотивам ароматов, сэмпл в подарок с напитком, красивую атмосферу… На фото - обещания) В реальности в помещении был какой-то хламовник, хоть и на фоне смутно узнаваемых интерьеров из рекламных постов, разб…

❤9✍4👍2🔥2

26 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC175 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчерашний день в 3 фото 📸❤️❤️

❤9😍6👏1🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC224 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Картина дня - Послеполуденное чаепитие, Ричард Эдвард Миллер 🫖

❤15🥰3👏1

16 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC259 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хвастаюсь желанным и обретенным ❤️ Chanel 19, parfum ❤️ Купила у Галины Анни - провереннее и честнее больше нет ни у кого, на мой взгляд 🫶 Любимая горько-сладкая зелень, пудровая, землистая, острая и влажная; аромат из времени, когда это действительно было заявление о себе, а не миллион похожих голосов на один лад. Красив, породист, многогранен - эстетский и чуть стервозный, и его невозможно не узнать или не замети…

❤14🔥8🥰1

15 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC849 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Оформила предзаказ на две новые книги по парфюмерной тематике 🥰 предвкушаю))) на сайте Эксмо уже есть - пробейте)

❤13🔥8✍4

11 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC229 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤16😍7💘4

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lana_in_perfumeland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Randewoo.ru
@randewoo_official · 66,918
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
ANGERMOLAEVA
@angermolaeva · 78,602
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
Та самая хранительница
@kosmetan_fr · 26,167
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lana_in_perfumeland” (@lana_in_perfumeland), 884 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lana_in_perfumeland.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.