Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Агентство разбитых сердец

@lana_impr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,143subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001698187585
TypeChannel
Username@lana_impr
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lana_impr

Growth

3,1433,1683,155.57 August 2026 — 3,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,168 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,157 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,143 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,139–3,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:473,143-14
10 Aug 2026, 07:443,157-11
7 Aug 2026, 14:323,168no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:023,168first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

534 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
45885.8%
custom 5427090451540761173336.18%
💯336.18%
🤝91.69%
😁10.187%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 4 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Apr 2026, 19:04 UTC≈2,530 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ну если в заставке нет Арсения в этот раз, то хоть немного (не впервые) будем его упоминать😅

44

4 Apr 2026, 19:04 UTC≈2,210 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kontrastnie_kaktusiiVideo

если вы думаете, что арсению легко дается после второго часа сидеть на стуле, то вы ошибаетесь

52

4 Apr 2026, 16:37 UTC≈2,440 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

нет какой то супер вовлеченности даже от самих игроков. минимум приколов, ни одного мема даже не вспомню, все какие-то на отьебись и ноль интертеймента даже со стороны организаторов пришли, поиграли на скуке, ну ушли и ладно, кто-то похихикал, где-то рядом попиздели ни о чем грустно

32

4 Apr 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,970 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

рада за гороха и джабрика канешн, но пока это самый грустно скучный турнир из всех, что я смотрела

💯3311😁1

4 Apr 2026, 16:33 UTC≈1,730 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дред и Игорь в финале

8

4 Apr 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,520 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

эх, Морфи малышка не прошла

12

4 Apr 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,270 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

надежда только на Игоря уже

28

4 Apr 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,200 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

мдаааа, минус Серёжа

custom 5427090451540761173332

4 Apr 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,220 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ну в принципе я так и предполагала, что Игорь выкарабкается😅 это я посмотрю

42

4 Apr 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,020 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

13

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lana_impr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 275,068 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Арсений
@arsdvatri · 174,926
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
ЖАБА — медиа-болото
@zhabqua · 103,615
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
СЕРГЕЙ МАТВИЕНКО
@yamamatvienko · 147,495
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
Pozov Live
@pozov · 259,796
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
ИМПРОВИЗАТОРЫ
@theimprovisatorsshow · 240,727
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
ШАСТУН
@shastoonchannel · 237,048
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026
Файлы Журавля Дима Журавлёв
@files_zhuravlya · 190,966
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
Чикен Карри 🐥
@chickencurryshow · 184,076
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Агентство разбитых сердец” (@lana_impr), 3,143 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lana_impr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.