Teh Lambo pinned «Join this channel to verify Premium trades https://t.me/tehkryptolambo»

Channel
Teh Lambo
@lambomoon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,007subscribers
+257 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001229612398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lambomoon |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lambomoon |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 7,007 | +157 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 6,850 | +39 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 6,811 | +16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 6,795 | +11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 6,784 | +32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 6,752 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 6,750 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 6,750 | first reading |
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.97%
- avg views ÷ 7,007 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 558
- 65 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.522%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 67
- of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 65 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (31 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,298 |
| Reactions total | 112 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 38 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 112 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
This leverage bump is actually a pretty sick update for a prop like BREAKOUTPROP : https://www.breakoutprop.com/join/team-lambo 30+ markets getting higher leverage, with BNB, XRP, LINK now at 5x. What I like most about it is that the challenge price hasn’t gone up. So you’re basically getting access to even more size without having to spend more. Risking $330 to trade $1M size in BTC is a pretty damn good deal. …
Join this channel to verify Premium trades https://t.me/tehkryptolambo
$ETH Has now disconnected from the $BTC moves and is doing its own things. This has now bounced almost 40% off the bottom while Bitcoin has not done even 20%. This couldnt cross 5k to make a new ATH while BTC went almost 1.8x from its previous ATH. This has unfinished business at 10k. So dont be surprised if this flies while Bitcoin trickles down. I see 2330 - 2390 as the next logical target here!
🔥8
$BTC Bitcoin has now tested the biggest resistance it can at the moment. Expect a massive rejection off this zone. WHY? Because its the third tap and we are yet to grab liquidity off the lows and hence according to me the low is not made yet. A close above 70k however changes everything. It puts bulls in charge with targets towards 100k and then later 200k. Which side are you leaning? I think we take out liquid…
🔥4
$SNDK $MU $SKHY #US100 All falling. As expected.
🔥2
$MU Micron We got rejected off to a support and now we are bouncing. We got our back to back 3 analysis correct. Expected this bounce off the support zone. 918 was the low and it was the 0.382 fib as well. Next stop logically should be 0.5 at 983 and that should be in my opinion local top for MICRON. If it indeed breaks 1000 on closing basis, we will be bullish for 1047 and then we see how to proceed. For now #…
🔥5
$SNDK Fell massively after this massive bull rally. This made the top at 1827 and then fell to 1565, Now bounced to retest the 0.5 fib at 1675 and currently residing above it. This can be a bearish retest of the support that broke yesterday on the closing basis. Now expecting a rejection off to 1500-1520 zone before any significant bounce can come. THIS CAN BE ABC correction from 1827 to 1565(A) to 1710(B) to 150…
🔥2
#US100 bounced as expected yesterday, arrows mentioned. Along with this our favorite stocks bounced as well, MICRON, SANDISK, SK HYNIX. Now this should act as a retest of the bearish breakdown. We expect a rejection off this zone. $MU $SNDK and $SKHY should get the rejection. The only bullish case is we get a H4 candle above 29800 on closing basis, that would prove this breakdown a fakeout and we march on towards…
$SKHY SK HYNIX we expected a bounce off 155 and we got it 100% off there. This made a low at 150 and bounced off to 167, thats the confluent resistance at 0.382 and a massive zone. We tested that and now gotten our rejection, Can be treated as a bearish retest as well. This should look to go back to previous lows near 155 as well if proven otherwise. We will be bullish on closing H4 above 180 only.
$INTC Tried and Tried but couldn't succeed. Too big of a mountain to stay above that 0.382 fib at 103.35 and has fallen down. This has broken down from a rising wedge as well. A massive daily red candle and an overall fall of 8% off the top signifies the sellers might want to take control soon. This should find some support at 94-95 here.
🔥2
$SPY at a massive support as well. It has bounced off 770 quite a couple of times in August and has found a good support. The top for now seems to be 780 and the range is this only. A break below 770 would be lethal for the markets and might target 760 or even 755. We watch and hope it doesnt break the structure here and everything returns to bull season.
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @lambomoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 55,678 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Teh Lambo” (@lambomoon), 7,007 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lambomoon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.