Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лалка лялякает

Channel

Лалка лялякает

@lalka_lalakaet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003443884340
TypeChannel
Username@lalka_lalakaet
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lalka_lalakaet

Growth

213025.511 August 2026 — 21 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30 subscribers11 August 20262 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 08:4730+7
26 Aug 2026, 17:5223-3
19 Aug 2026, 01:0826+5
11 Aug 2026, 14:1621no change
11 Aug 2026, 13:4721first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54068513544612433315054.9%
custom 540711732890098330799.89%
custom 528295833270383492066.59%
custom 528729522317560477766.59%
🍓55.49%
💘55.49%
custom 528273263217243155433.30%
custom 528280974831023100122.20%
custom 528305224216376691622.20%
🤡22.20%
custom 522674364466020836211.10%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC10 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Blood_hospitalsPhoto

┏ַ ┄ִ ◌⃘ 𓈒 ⋆ 「𐨌 ׁᛝ゙̣̣̣ᛝ̣ ׁ」 ⋆ 𓈒 ◌⃘ ִ┄ ַ┓ 𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋 ┗ַ ۫─‌┄ᮬ۫─ 𓈒 ۫✿𝆬 ⃞꒰ᰰ ׁ─ᮬ┄۫─۫ ַ┛ ِ𝃡 𝃣෫۪۟ ๑ۭ ´ ˘ ू᷒᩹ ꒱᜔֙ㅤ𓈒 ִ 𝃚ㅤ ꣑୧ֹㅤ 𝅾ㅤ [💉] -Я 𝐱𝐨ч𝐲 п𝐨иг𝐩𝐚𝐓ь 𝐁 𝐀𝐧𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥 𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐇𝐨 𝐩𝐚𝐇д𝐨𝐦ы 𝐇𝐞 д𝐨х𝐨дя𝐓 д𝐚ж𝐞 д𝐨 𝟒 смены ₊ 𝂅𝅄 ׁ ࿙͜͜࿙࿚ 𝂅ִׄ‌ׄ‌𝆹𝅥 ׁ𝅄 ׁ ✿॒࣪ ׁ 𝅄𝆹𝅥 𝂅ִׄ‌ׄ‌ ࿙࿚͜͜࿚ ׁ 𝅄 𝂅₊ ˚ʚ♡ɞ₊ ТОГДА ТЕБЕ К НАМ! ₊˚ʚ♡ɞ ᧗ы blood_hospital! ӄанал по ранам в игре Animal hospital! 𝅄 ׁ ⸼ ︵ ˗ˏˋ┊ִ🤍 ׁ⃞࡙┊ˊˎ˗ ︵ ⸼ ׁ 𝅄 ⏝ֵ֦۫ິ⏝ິ︶ ִׁ . 𝅄 ★ິ ୨ᤢ⭔

custom 54068513544612433312custom 52829583327038349201

10 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC10 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @compot18CFPhoto

Рт пост 《Я нарисовал(а)/написал(а) прон, а друзья сказали что я конченый(ая)》 《Где можно найти 18+ рисунок/анимацию/фанфик с ####?》 Было? Доброе пожаловать в Compot 18+ CF

custom 52830522421637669162

7 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC27 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

❤️❤️❤️❤️🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀Уроды,фу нахуй. 🩻 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀 🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩 ❤️❤️❤️#арт #art_digital #tcc 😀😀😀⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

custom 54068513544612433313custom 52267436446602083621custom 52829583327038349201

4 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC32 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

I love you mom..I love you dad...😇 🌟🌟🌟❤️#арт #art_digital #tcc 🌟🌟🌟 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 А Эрик идёт нахуй, я его рисовать не буду.

custom 52827326321724315543🤡2custom 52828097483102310012custom 54068513544612433311

2 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC32 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🎞️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔣 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🛢 #art_digital #арт #pyromaniac 🤩🤩🤩 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🤩🤩🤩

custom 54068513544612433314custom 52872952231756047771custom 54071173289009833071

1 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC30 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Храни бог того кто придумал шаурму. 😇 #щп

custom 54068513544612433312custom 52872952231756047771custom 54071173289009833071

30 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC34 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 #арт #art_digital

custom 52872952231756047773custom 54068513544612433312

30 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC35 viewsread 11 August 2026

Рисую то что скажет подписота. 🎞️🎞️🎞️〰️1️⃣🔤3️⃣〰️ Все будет в ленивых но прикольных скетчах. 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🤩🤩🤩🤩

28 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC37 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Дайте пж туториал как не бояться работы и людей... #щп

custom 52829583327038349203

26 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC38 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩🥩 Kas sa arvad, et ma ei saa? Ma olen juba nii kaua oodanud, et suudan veelgi kauem oodata. 🤩🤩🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎞️🎞️🎞️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #арт #art_digital #class

custom 54068513544612433313💘1custom 54071173289009833071

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lalka_lalakaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лалка лялякает” (@lalka_lalakaet), 30 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lalka_lalakaet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.