🌟
custom 52269372446060392398custom 54741595951380960228custom 54472947207304999287custom 53165084525566567431custom 53643197879775677221custom 53661150027029010191

Channel
@lalalalattt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
253subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001953669390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lalalalattt |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lalalalattt |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 253 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 252 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:47 | 254 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:45 | 253 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:30 | 253 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
289 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5364021253390757137 | 74 | 25.6% | |
| custom 5368330329654309202 | 61 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5195373018846618954 | 57 | 19.7% | |
| custom 5375549675757658004 | 42 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5310061101054976547 | 29 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5226937244606039239 | 8 | 2.77% | |
| custom 5474159595138096022 | 8 | 2.77% | |
| custom 5447294720730499928 | 7 | 2.42% | |
| custom 5316508452556656743 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5364319787977567722 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5366115002702901019 | 1 | 0.346% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lalalalattt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌟
custom 52269372446060392398custom 54741595951380960228custom 54472947207304999287custom 53165084525566567431custom 53643197879775677221custom 53661150027029010191
🥰
custom 536833032965430920212custom 53755496757576580046custom 51953730188466189545custom 53640212533907571374
🤩🤩🤩
custom 536402125339075713711custom 53683303296543092027custom 51953730188466189543custom 53755496757576580041
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53640212533907571372custom 51953730188466189541custom 53683303296543092021
Video, posted without a caption
custom 51953730188466189541custom 53640212533907571371custom 53755496757576580041
🙂
custom 53683303296543092026custom 51953730188466189545custom 53640212533907571374custom 53755496757576580043
💐
custom 519537301884661895411custom 53755496757576580049custom 53640212533907571378custom 53683303296543092023
там отвечу
http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=Sq9jIARcdbVEFsk
🥰🥹
custom 536402125339075713712custom 53683303296543092029custom 51953730188466189547custom 53755496757576580043custom 53100611010549765472
за ноготочками бежим к лере 💅
custom 53683303296543092021
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53755496757576580046custom 53100611010549765475custom 53683303296543092025custom 53640212533907571374custom 51953730188466189543
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lalalalattt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“гайка” (@lalalalattt), 253 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lalalalattt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.