All sold fuck shet

Channel
๐๐จ๐ค๐ฅ๐จ ๐ท๐ฐ๐ถ๐ค๐ฉ
@lalaerze
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
159subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003947069151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lalaerze |
| Created | 15 June 2026 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lalaerze |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 159 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 149 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 149 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 147 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 380.2%
- avg views รท 159 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 605
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- โ
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (15 June 2026 โ 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,209 |
| Reactions total | โ |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
๐๐ข๐ข๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐จ๐ก๐ง ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐ : - ๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ - ๐ฃ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ฉ๐๐ฅ - ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ก ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐๐ - ๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ง ๐๐ข๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ง ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ก ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ก ๐๐ข ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฅ๐๐ก ๐๐ : @cgcdgd
๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ด๐๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐บ ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐น๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป โ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐/๐ฆ๐๐๐ โข ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ ๐๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐บ ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ต โฃ ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐'๐ ๐ผ๐ธ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ โข ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ/๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ/๐ณ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ผ/๐๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฝ๐ต๐ผ๐๐ผ โฃ ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐น๐ผ๐๐ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ธ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป'๐ ๐ฏ๐น๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @lalaerze. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 283,045 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐จ๐ค๐ฅ๐จ ๐ท๐ฐ๐ถ๐ค๐ฉโ (@lalaerze), 159 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lalaerze.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.