Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for XEDI MAIN CHANNEL

Channel

XEDI MAIN CHANNEL

@XEDIIMAINCHANNEL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

394subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002589596019
TypeChannel
Username@XEDIIMAINCHANNEL
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/XEDIIMAINCHANNEL

Growth

383394388.59 Aug 2026, 17:31 — 383 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:15 — 394 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:3110 Aug 2026, 04:15
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 381–396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:15394+11
9 Aug 2026, 17:31383first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.35%
avg views ÷ 394 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.2
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (9 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total251
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
337.5%
🖕337.5%
🤣112.5%
🤮112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC14 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @achishops

FORSALE CODM TXT GARENA PO TO PERO YUNG SRC AY HINDI GALING SA GARENA TXT 200K = 50 PHP💰 ✔️LESS BAN ✔️PALDO ✔️QUALITY ✔️UNOOTED 📌TAKE NOTE - MANY INVALID BECAUSE ITS NOT GARENA TXT PEDBAK SA TXT KO CLICK ME DM TO BUY: @achilalamove

Signed ♕ 𝓐𝓢𝓒 achi kaldag (245 VOUCHES)

9 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @CHANNELNIPITOPhoto

Kilala nyo ba tong tantado nato pa send sakin tele nya pasalamat sya na restrict mess ko di ko ma chat nang mumura pa

Signed Taptapito (7 VOUCHES) Nag lloot off

9 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC7 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @lalaerzePhoto

𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗨𝗣𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗗𝗠 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧 𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗖𝗢𝗗𝗠 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧 : - 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 (𝗳𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗵 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗿 𝗴𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹) - 𝗣𝗛 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 - 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗮 - 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗠𝗬 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 : - 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻 (𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗿 𝗴𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵) - 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗻𝗼 𝗳𝗯 𝗻𝗼 𝗻𝘂𝗺 - 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗣𝗛 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗿 - 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 - 𝗚𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗺 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘂𝗿 𝗳𝗲𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗺 𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗴𝗳 (𝗻𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟯) 𝗜𝗙 𝗨 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗨𝗣𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗗𝗠 : @cgcdgd

Signed 𝘊𝘨𝘤𝘥𝘨

9 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC8 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

hi bibi

🖕31🤣1🤮1

Signed ♕ 𝓐𝓢𝓒 kai 💵

9 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC7 viewsread 9 August 2026

PALARO Muna ako pre

Signed 𝐁𝐧𝐬 • 𝙓𝙚𝙣𝙤

9 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC7 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ♕ 𝓐𝓢𝓒 kai 💵

9 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC9 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @XENOSTOCKPoll

PILI KAYO

  1. PALARO OR75%
  2. DROP ACCOUNT38%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed 𝐁𝐧𝐬 • 𝙓𝙚𝙣𝙤

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @XEDIIMAINCHANNEL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

PILI KAYO

  1. PALARO OR75%
  2. DROP ACCOUNT38%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 596,618 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“XEDI MAIN CHANNEL” (@XEDIIMAINCHANNEL), 394 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XEDIIMAINCHANNEL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.