https://youtube.com/shorts/RRNGAJ4g6q8?is=aM9u4kO9Nz5qspVx

Channel
LA INFORMACIÓN ES PODER
@lainfoespoderyconocimiento
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
477subscribers
+276 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001168438186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lainfoespoderyconocimiento |
| Created | 6 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lainfoespoderyconocimiento |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 477 | +276 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 201 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 201 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.02%
- avg views ÷ 477 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 288 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 17m 00s
- Average length
- 1m 08s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://youtube.com/shorts/9YmlHD3FQ-E?is=XUNCX3PkB_-kkEFY
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 Lo que dijimos hace tres días, que allí les tratan peor que a los perros. Sus propios sicarios compatriotas echándolos de su país y tratándolos como a escoria por volver. Otro ejemplo más de que Marruecos es nuestro enemigo y va a muerte contra nosotros y contra todo el que no vaya con ellos, incluido su propio pueblo
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 ¿Ha quedado claro el mensaje o aún no para los ciegos peninsulares que no quieren ver? ¿Ves alguna mujer, bebé o algún menor de 14 años ahí?
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 Marroquí explicando como España puede alcanzar métodos de presión no militares contra Marruecos para destruirlo política y económicamente. Nosotros tenemos la sartén por el mango, no al revés, pese a que tengan cogido por los 🥚🥚 a perro Sánchez, ese es su problema, no el nuestro
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 Cuántas cosas tenemos que aprender de Polonia y Austria en materia de protección fronteriza
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 Marruecos ha puesto a prueba a España con la ayuda de EEUU e Israel. Recordad la marcha verde, civiles invadiendo territorio español en el Sáhara occidental. Recordad el islote de Perejil que fue una prueba para ver la capacidad de respuesta de España. Y ahora esto, nos han demostrado que pueden invadir nuestras ciudades autónomas y la comunidad de Canarias civilmente para que nuestro ejército no pueda dispara…
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 Todo cerrado y la gente con miedo porque se ha roto su paz diaria. Pero viva España, el pueblo español, el rey y la puta mierda de gobierno. Nadie hace absolutamente nada, somos putos robots viendo en tercera persona la película, es decir, estamos a merced del nuevo orden mundial. Yo no veo a las generaciones de ahora defendiendo España, ¿quién lo va a hacer, los jóvenes que no tienen mili obligatoria y no sab…
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 Mirad, esta es la policía de mierda que tenemos en este país. No hacen bien su trabajo (deberían cogerlos del cuello, multarles y llevarles al calabozo o a la frontera) y encima amenazan a españoles que simplemente están viendo y grabando como hacen su trabajo arreglando una situación anormal, nada ilegal. Estos sicarios del estado llamados policía nacional se preocupan más de los locales que de echar a los pe…
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 Atención a lo que dice este moro descerebrado; como si fuese culpa nuestra que sean unos salvajes, que en su país sean menos que perros para su gobierno y les manden a morir al mar. En tu país no te dan comida puto desagradecido de mierda. Si tardan dos días te jodes porque no tenemos por qué darle comida a gente que entra masiva e ilegalmente poniendo en peligro a nuestra nación y a sus pueblos, por no hablar…
🇲🇦🔪🇪🇸 Así deja la escoria humana marroquí las zonas por las que pasan. ¿De verdad piensan que aquí tienen un hueco para ellos? 🖕 Cada uno en su casa y Dios en la de todos. Y los cerdos a sus pocilgas
https://youtube.com/shorts/oBK06-_cSIQ?is=S7seMUC5bvHTs2OH
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lainfoespoderyconocimiento. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,144,688 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LA INFORMACIÓN ES PODER” (@lainfoespoderyconocimiento), 477 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lainfoespoderyconocimiento.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.