Channel
@laifflowerstemptations
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003758519870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @laifflowerstemptations |
| Description | Добро пожаловать в лайф канал, тут вы найдете ещё больше дополнительной информации о флуде, союзы, ресты и даты рождения |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/laifflowerstemptations |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 41 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 41 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 161 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❯ 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍◞ ˕ 💤 ໒꒰ྀིっ˕ -｡꒱ྀི১ 𓂃 茶鷦 ₊ « !? » 𝘓'𝘈𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘦. 𝘓𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘯𝘤é𝘦𝘴-𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘩é𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘵é 𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘭é — 𝘱𝘢𝘳 𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘢𝘶 𝘦𝘵 𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘵é𝘮𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘭'𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮é 𝘱𝘢𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘶𝘳 𝘱𝘳é𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘐𝘭 𝘯'𝘺 𝘢 𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘴 "𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘴" 𝘦𝘵 "𝘪𝘭𝘴" — 𝘪𝘭 𝘺 𝘢 𝘶𝘯 "𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘴". 𝘔𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘵, 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘦𝘢𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦: 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘦𝘴, 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘭𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘥'𝘶𝘯 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭è𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧é
❤1
#LIHUA_OWNER •Репост тайм• ~Начало ~Конец Приносим извинения если кого либо забыли! Всем прекрасного времени суток!
𓈒 𓏫 🥰 𓈒 ݁ 𝐕𝕀𝐃𝖤𝗢 ݂۫ ᕠ ⑅ᥤ 𝐃𝗲𝐜𝕝𝕚𝗇 𓏼 ꣓ ˖ִ ✿՞ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 ㅤ꒰ ̫̫ 𝐌𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐛𝐲::｡𝐃𝗲𝐜𝕝𝕚𝗇 ݁ ⩊¦ ༷۪ ⠀ 𓈒ׁ ༷ ꒱̫ 𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝:: #Lyney ༷۪ ♬𓈒𓏸˚ ㅤ ㅤ۫˙݂Ი 𐑼 𓈒݂ 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐊 ◝ ㅤ 𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐬: #𝐃𝐂_𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 #𝐃𝐂_𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭
ㅤㅤㅤNEW VIDEO ࣪𓏲ּ ════════════ ────── ・Editor:March 7 ・ib::our (???) • comment:: чем я занимаюсь ═════════════ TT channel— жмяк #𝙃𝙏𝘿𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙤
◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️ ◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️ ✨ 〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰 Crᴇᴀᴛᴏr- 𝗦𝗔𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗔 ιᥒ𐔥𐔖 〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰 #ℜᴇᴩᴏsᴛ_𝒍𝒏𝒅 #𝔙ideo_𝒍𝒏𝒅
ׄ ꒰ྀིׅ ⸝ ︵⏜︵︵ ˳ ִ ۫ 🎐 ﾞ۪ 𓈒ׄ .魂 𓈒ׄ ︵⏜︵︵ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ➦𝒞rᴇᴀᴛᴏr › Сакура ➦𝓘dᴇᴀ › не наша! ︵⏜︵︵ 𓈒ׄ 🎐 ۫ ִ ˳ ꒱ྀིׅ ׄ
Хотелось бы семейников, пишите @leeasyaaa #impotant_JPLL
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝑵𝑬𝑾 𝑽𝑰𝑫𝑬𝑶 — Ну я всё такие согласился на звёзды, уступил 𝑪𝑹𝑬𝑨𝑻𝑶𝑹: × Вайс 𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑲: × тыц 𝑭𝑶𝑹𝑴𝑨𝑻: × видео 𝑰𝑫𝑬𝑨: × наша #ᴋᴏнᴛᴇнᴛдᴧяᴛᴛ𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙧𝙖𝙧𝙮 #Репост𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙧𝙖𝙧𝙮 [🪼]
🐚 – #репост_EK #важно_EK Дорогие союзники, мы в активном поиске ньюшек и администрации! Наш инфо канал: @Info_Estate Бот по вступлению: @Estate_introductionsbot
Кадзуха повышается с младшего админа до старшего! Поздравляем! 🌟 #ℐ𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡_𝑽𝑯 #ℛ𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡_𝑽𝑯 (по желанию) #𝒦𝑎𝑣𝑒ℎ
♡⃕ ˒谷᷼꒱ ֪ 🫖 🌟𝐎𝐎𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐅𝐎𝐑 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🌟𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐒 𖹭 . 🤩 ᭡͡𖹭 ྀི𐦯 𑜷︩⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️───────── ⭐️⭐️⭐️㑫㐩 🤩🤩 𝅄 ꒰⁐𖹭⁐꒱ ⪩🤩⪨ 🥹🥹 Старший администратор (1/1). 🥹 ⭐️Обязанности: слежка за порядком в чате, выдавание наказаний, решение конфликтов в отсутствии владельца. 🥹🥹 Следящий (1/2). 🥹 ⭐️Обязанности: заключение союзов,делать репосты,слежка за данными союзами 🥹🥹 Активист (1/2). 🥹 ⭐️Обязанности: Поднимать актив,вливать нью,…
⚡🔤аш театр безумно нуждается в новых союзниках ! @ info & @ conditions & @ bot for union #repost_𝐴𝑒𝘓
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @laifflowerstemptations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 368,289 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@laifflowerstemptations named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Life Channel "Flowers of Temptation"” (@laifflowerstemptations), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laifflowerstemptations.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.