Channel
@laichac
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002351717501 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @laichac |
| Description | 🌟 Добро пожаловать в "Лайфаки для жизни" – ваш ежедневный источник уникальных и полезных советов, которые сделают вашу жизнь легче и комфортнее! 🌟 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 28 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/laichac |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @alpaz24/2984 Oct 2024, 09:13 UTC | @laichac/67 · this entry4 Oct 2024, 09:16 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @laichac/71 · this entry9 Oct 2024, 21:37 UTC | @alpaz24/3039 Oct 2024, 21:37 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @laichac/72 · this entry9 Oct 2024, 21:52 UTC | @alpaz24/3049 Oct 2024, 21:52 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @laichac/73 · this entry9 Oct 2024, 22:10 UTC | @alpaz24/3059 Oct 2024, 22:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @laichac/66 · this entry30 Sept 2024, 18:43 UTC | @vseabovsem1/11330 Sept 2024, 18:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @laichac/71 · this entry9 Oct 2024, 21:37 UTC | @vseabovsem1/1189 Oct 2024, 21:39 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @alpaz24 | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (5–3) |
| @vseabovsem1 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 September 2024 to 8 November 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @alpaz24. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 10 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 10 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2024 to 10 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| LatgC7HxL | 1 | 26 October 2024 | 26 October 2024 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2024 to 10 November 2024. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Насколько хорошо вы знакомы с Telegram?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔗Подписывайтесь 🔗
👍Самый громадный ноутбук в мире с диагональю 43 дюйма, внутри: Intel Core i7-1165G7 и NVIDIA RTX 2060 Graphics.👍 🔗Ссылка 🔗
🔗Подписывайтесь 🔗
📌✔️GeekBrains — это образовательная экосистема. В ней любой человек может получить востребованную специальность, развить навыки и начать работать в интернете. Мы помогаем с нуля освоить профессию в области программирования, маркетинга, управления и дизайна и гарантированно найти работу. 10 лет на рынке образования 4+ млн пользователей 5 направлений обучения 200+ преподавателей 220+ курсов 1000+ открытых ваканс…
👍Как читать маркировку шин❗️ Подписывайтесь 🔗Ссылка 🔗
👍💝Многоцветный клейкий светящийся 3D ночник-бабочка, 12 шт/набор 4.7 (972) 368 отзывов 820 купили https://aliexpress.ru/one-price?spm=a2g2w.home.0.1.b5175586MQ5suv&spmC=shelf&spmD=0&sku_id=12000036610235804&productIds=1005006285432965&skuId=12000036610235804&allSkuIds=12000036610235804 ПОДПИСЫВАЙТЕСЬ 🔗Ссылка 🔗
💥💥💥https://aliexpress.ru/one-price?spm=a2g2w.home.0.1.b5175586MQ5suv&spmC=shelf&spmD=0&productIds=1005006078846277&skuId=12000035633034705&allSkuIds=12000035633034705&sku_id=12000035633034705 Женский Короткий стильный кошелек на молнии с узором Личи, модный вместительный кошелек с несколькими отделениями для карт и монет на молнии ☄️👍Подписывайтесь 🔗Ссылка 🔗
Выход документалки про создателя биткоина, анонс дивидендов от «ТКС Холдинга» и другие новости дня: — В Турции вслед за Россией заблокировали доступ к Discord vc.ru/services/1560146 — HBO выпустил документалку про биткоин, в которой назвал создателем криптовалюты канадского разработчика Питера Тодда vc.ru/crypto/1560695 — Минюст США подтвердил, что обсуждает раздел бизнеса Google после признания компании монополис…
▎🌊 Путешествие по океану технологий: Тренды 2024 года 🚀 Представьте, что мир технологий — это бескрайний океан, полный удивительных островов и неизведанных глубин. В 2024 году нас ждут новые волны, которые изменят наш курс! Давайте вместе отправимся в это увлекательное путешествие и узнаем, что нас ждет на горизонте! 🏄♂️ ▎1. Искусственный интеллект: наш верный компаньон 🌬 Искусственный интеллект — это ветер перем…
☄️✔️Telegram создаст аналог YouTube в своем мессенджере, компания объявила конкурс для разработчиков iOS на создание видеохостинга, который продлится до 25 октября, следует из Telegram-канала "Telegram Contests". ❗️❗️❗️ ✔️"Telegram проводит конкурс для разработчиков iOS на создание медиаплеера с нуля. Задача: внедрить медиаплеер с поддержкой потоковой передачи HLS (как для аудио, так и для вид…
Идея, как позаботиться о своем здоровье осенью Ходите на рынки. Мы серьезно. Осень просто создана для того, чтобы есть больше овощей и фруктов. Во-первых, это вкусно. Сезонные овощи обычно доставляются вскоре после сбора, а значит, они сохранили максимум вкусовых качеств. Во-вторых, это полезно. Исследования показывают, что фермерские овощи и овощи с домашних грядок, собранные в сезон, имеют более высокую концентр…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @laichac. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Насколько хорошо вы знакомы с Telegram?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2024 to 10 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@laichac named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📌Лайфаки для жизни🇷🇺” (@laichac), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laichac.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.