Channel
@lagoda_des
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
259subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002677679073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lagoda_des |
| Description | ⌨️ Записки дизайнера: идеи, кейсы, практика 👩🏼💻 айтишная жизнь в агентстве 📎 композиция наше всё 🔳 дифирамбы Малевичу |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lagoda_des |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 259 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 259 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (30 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 507 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
75 reactions across 9 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 19 | 25.3% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 24.0% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 13.3% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Онпику исполнилось 16 - мы почти совершеннолетняя компания 🎂 Погуляли на корпоративе, который в этом году был посвящен теме сказочного леса 🌳 🧝♀️🦋 Предполагалось, что я буду светлым эльфом, но уши предательски торчали, как у гоблина. Спасибо организаторам за отличную программу, призы-подарки, веселое настроение и уютную локацию. В этот раз, ко всему прочему, была ещё тёплая чудесная погода 🌞
🔥6❤3🤣2
«Наш бетон не про прочность. Наш бетон про эмоции». Мог бы написать мамкин психолог в очередном душеспасительном блоге, но подобные тейки встречаются во вполне себе бизнесовых материалах: КП, маркетинговых гайдах, презентациях, на сайтах, в описаниях услуг. «Это не просто коммерческое предложение — это дорожная карта вашего успеха», — можно увидеть в смете на плитку в санузел. «Шаурма не только утоляет голод, но …
❤🔥4👍3🤓2
Как мы подружили Тильду с нейросетями 2️⃣ (первая серия про Тильду тут) Часто спрашивают, как встроить нейронки, чтобы это помогало в работе, например, с той же Тильдой, а не отнимало время на эксперименты. Расскажу, как это устроено у нас. Два рабочих сценария: 👨💻 Допиливаем стили стандартных блоков кодом. Блок корректируется визуально и при этом остаётся простым в редактировании — заказчик может сам обновить ко…
👏5❤2🫡2
В продолжение тильдового вопроса — делюсь эфиром, который открыл тему. Разбирали с опорой на нашу практику в агентстве и по ходу отвечали на частые вопросы. Будет полезно маркетологам, владельцам бизнеса и дизайнерам, которые хотят поработать с платформой. Коротко скажу, что успели обсудить: 📌 для каких проектов Тильда подходит, и когда лучше сразу смотреть в сторону другого решения 📌 интернет-магазин на Тильде: с…
🤝4⚡1🔥1
Ни слоя больше 🍰 pinned a photo
Навайбкодила подростку приложение, чтобы он повторял инглиш летом. Предполагала, что оно упросит и напомнит тот словарный запас, который уже есть и мягко его дополнит. С любовью и вниманием докинула туда слова из знакомых ему и нежно любимых песен Nirvana, ожидая восторга и "моя мама-дизайнер самая лучшая" 😍 😒 В итоге, после многочисленных уговоров, угроз, манипуляций всё же заставила упросила попробовать. Он потих…
👍6🔥6🆒1
С чего начать, если вы решили самостоятельно сделать сайт на Tilda? Вчера провела эфир (запись будет чуть позже) в паре с любимым коллегой про популярный конструктор, благодаря которому можно быстро и дёшево сотворить сайт для своего проекта. Попробую сделать небольшой полезный сериал на эту тему 📺1️⃣ Допустим, у вас нет задачи сделать визуально аккуратный сайт и нужно хоть как-нибудь. Даже если так и вы готовы при…
❤2👌2🔥2
Пропустила в отпуске офисный звездный час, лежу на пляже и смотрю на коллег 😎 ⤵️
❤2💅2🦄1😁1
😝 Все люди, как люди, а мы — суперзвезда На Первом Тульском вышел репортаж про нейросети, в съемках которого мы вчера принимали непосредственное участие 😎 Забираем себе, отправляем друзьям и родным, хвастаемся маме, что мы в телевизоре и готовим красную дорожку на входе в офис 😎
❤7🔥1
Сегодня необычный проект: Дизайн ютуб-канала Неуспешный бизнес: Оформила лого, вставки для роликов, инфографику и визуальные приёмы, чтобы разбавлять видео Это подкаст историй про ошибки в бизнесе, где маркетологи анализируют, как это всё случилось. Все готовые шаблон можно использовать при монтаже, оформила исходники в удобный гайд. Хотя сегодня и вторник, отнесём его к рубрике #пятничныйкейс
🔥3❤2👍1🤝1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lagoda_des. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 430,161 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ни слоя больше 🍰” (@lagoda_des), 259 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lagoda_des.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.