Channel
@ladycactuskek
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622090373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ladycactuskek |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ladycactuskek |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 50 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 51 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
597 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 296 | 49.6% | |
| 👍 | 198 | 33.2% | |
| 😢 | 81 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 3.35% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.168% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.168% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 597reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2022 to 31 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не буду говорить многословно, просто оставлю все это. Мне правда было очень интересно, приятно, и хорошо находиться как в этом фандоме, так и в других группах общения тгкшных и фикбуковских. Вы все — чудо! Меня здесь очень тепло приняли, и, как бы это сейчас эгоистично не звучало, но я знала, что сразу найду здесь близких по духу и меня заметят. В каком плане заметят — уже вам решать. Но, уверена, у каждого из присут…
❤102😢9🎉1👍1
Из-за некоторых несостыков я ухожу на неопределенный срок, сразу извиняюсь, и по своей неосторожности удалила файл с написанными гонками Не знаю, вернусь ли, простите
😢50❤1🥰1
Это шутка я юморю просто все написано
👍21❤1
Прикиньте если бы я просто устроила конкретно мощнейший наеб над всеми, и не написала бы гонки, перенося дату выхода на любое удобное время, но не выкладывала бы, потому что материала готового у меня бы не было 🤔🤔
👍27
В слова вслушивайтесь. Берите на заметку, будете завтра под нее читать часть из гонок ;) #песни
❤15👍2
Я в ноль, серьезно, не думала, что получится НАСТОЛЬко ужасно стеклянно..... За разбитые сердца ответственность не беру.
😢22❤2👍1
Я дописала, это пиздец
❤14👍3
Я СЕГОДНЯ НИЩЕТА.
❤18👍1
Будто скрин со стрима. Так непринужденно блять.. будто Ваня собирается уходить куда-то, а жожик стримит, и они чмокаются так на прощание Япыаыапыпырыр я не можу все
❤36👍1
🥸🥸🥸
❤32👍1
Не убьете, если скажу, что гонки переносятся на завтрашний день? Я человек рабочий просто ...😕
❤20👍2
Нет, нахуй оно мне надо? У меня дела, а поздно вечером гонки. Не забудьте пристегнуть ремни безопасности. Хотя кому они нужны?🤔
👍26❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ladycactuskek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,341,278 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“не забудьте полить кактус” (@ladycactuskek), 50 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ladycactuskek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.