Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 50 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 15:22
143
+1
13 Sept 2026, 07:56
142
+4
14 Aug 2026, 17:07
138
+1
8 Aug 2026, 23:16
137
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:01
137
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
123 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5249380488837098642
42
34.1%
custom 5249327201177857200
29
23.6%
custom 5249384942718186258
18
14.6%
custom 5391302765395862128
16
13.0%
custom 5249199911232104982
7
5.69%
custom 5391348420898214588
6
4.88%
custom 5249288945904152584
3
2.44%
custom 5386516024344454999
2
1.63%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Оранжевый - хит сезона 🧡
Участвую в активности от Кристины - #охота_за_цветом.
Кристина дала мне задание:
Алина, оранжевый хочу у тебя видеть, ты девушка яркая, уверена, найдешь этот цвет)
Меня безумно увлекло ➰
Собирала свою яркую подборку не за один раз. Во время прогулок это как-то само по себе действует медитативно — и вдруг начинаешь смотреть на привычное совсем другим взглядом, замечая детали, которые раньше…
Захотелось поделиться чудесным прошлогодним отдыхом в Турции ☀️
Я летала на параплане впервые! Было захватывающе, яркие впечатления на всю жизнь. Очень рекомендую сгонять в Олюдениз и сделать тоже самое :)
В самой Турции также была впервые) наверное, впечатления зависят от выбранной локации. Мы были в Фетхие, на стыке Черного и Эгейского моря, в маленьком отеле на первой линии. Поэтому мне оооочень понравилось 🔥
С…
Бурый мишкинс 🐻
Ну какооооов! Мой уютный мягкий толстячок^^
Вязать букле было непросто, зато фактура очень крутая, а какая нежность ммм ➰
Нереально кайфанула от вышивки мухоморчиков) я никогда не вышивала по одежде, а это прикольно, как оказалось!
Вязала самого мишку из двух видов пряж: букле и альпака на шелке, приложила фото 📎
А одежду и вышивку пряжей фирмы Drops: Air, Aplaca Silk и Nord. Я теперь фанатка это…
Клубничное поло 🍓
Последняя вещь из весенних вязаний, однозначно самая яркая 😅
Это #поло_изо_льна от Евгении Телегиной. Очень нравятся её описания, визуально приятные, понятные - точно не последнее изделие от автора)
Я случайно нашла пряжу на Авито с названием Allino. Ну, это судьба, подумала я 😂 Её уже сняли с производства, а жаль, она классная!
Пряжа - BC Garn Allino цвет 16
Состав - 50% лён, 50% хлопок
Вес мот…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @lady_darkwinter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алина со спицами” (@lady_darkwinter), 143 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lady_darkwinter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
