Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TÖMAnotas || F1, вело, другие гонки и околоспорт

Channel

TÖMAnotas || F1, вело, другие гонки и околоспорт

@lacasadetoma

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

290subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460613092
TypeChannel
Username@lacasadetoma
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lacasadetoma

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2782902847 August 2026 — 278 subscribers8 August 2026 — 278 subscribers8 August 2026 — 279 subscribers16 August 2026 — 280 subscribers30 August 2026 — 279 subscribers9 September 2026 — 289 subscribers16 September 2026 — 290 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 276–292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 02:37290+1
9 Sept 2026, 08:18289+10
30 Aug 2026, 12:15279-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:38280+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:37279+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:34278no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:04278first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3941.5%
😁1819.1%
👍1617.0%
🔥88.51%
🤔55.32%
🤨22.13%
custom 537508119360993021911.06%
👎11.06%
🙈11.06%
🤮11.06%
🥰11.06%
🥴11.06%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
101
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lacasadetoma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мятеж в футболе вызовет революцию в автогонках и «Ф-1»? Занятно наблюдать, как против диктаторства и сомнительных действий верхушки ФИФА и ее президента Джанни Инфантино выступили единым фронтом все европейские ассоциации УЕФА. Уверенно грозят бойкотом ее турниров и заставляют ФИФА давать заднюю И тут легко провести параллели с автоспортом – ФИА и ее президентом Бен Сулайемом, которым давно недовольны европейские а

2custom 53750811936099302191

Signed Artyom Rubankov

7 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC59 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

2🤔1

Signed Artyom Rubankov

7 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC87 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

6👍1

Signed Artyom Rubankov

6 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC104 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новым фанам «Ф-1» действительно плевать на нюансы пилотажа, или это боссы «Ф-1» нашли удобную лазейку для оправдания цензуры? Да, в последних Гран-при графика перестала показывать заряд аккумулятора и даже динамику скоростей – и ой как удобно, именно в моменты, когда должен был включаться ужасный суперклиппинг для перезарядки батареи на прямой или в повороте с падением темпа. Ответ босса «Ф-1» на прямой вопрос: да

👍3

Signed Artyom Rubankov

6 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC116 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

4👍1

Signed Artyom Rubankov

6 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC97 viewsread 8 August 2026

И вновь спасибо, @ForeverJokerreally! Обещаю, потрачу их с умом!:)

Signed Artyom Rubankov

6 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC97 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо за звезду, @ForeverJokerreally! Вау! Теперь у меня их 12. Еще немного (до сотни:D - и смогу купить первую рекламу каналу:)

😁4🥰1

Signed Artyom Rubankov

6 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC98 views7 reactions101 Starsread 8 August 2026

Погачар – величайший велогонщик в истории? Доминатор в самую конкурентную эпоху Мне часто оппонируют в личке, типа, «да как можно сравнивать Погачара с Мерксом – велики так изменились, Эдди на них тоже выносил бы» Что ж. Я решил изучить вопрос и докопаться до истины, так ли это. Нашел показатели МПК пантеона пятикратных победителей «ТдФ» и сравнил с Тадееем Меркс сдавал лабораторный тест в Кельне в 1975-м и в тече

4👍3

Signed Artyom Rubankov

5 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Турция – уникальное футбольное место: огромный потенциал для создания крутой звездной лиги Экспресс-трансфер Салаха в «Трабзонспор», на самом деле, подчеркнул, какой же в Турции был и остается гигантский скрытый потенциал для превращения в одну из главных футбольных лиг планеты Ведь здесь: • все еще высокий уровень футбола, сильная лига, крутые фанаты и стадионы, можно играть в еврокубках • но мусульманская культу

👍2🥴1

Signed Artyom Rubankov

5 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC110 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Победительницу «ТдФ» распяли за посадку даже свои Если не верите вдруг, что по королеве «Тур де Франс»-2025 прошлись в соцсетях, то... Да, представляете – бывшие профи, комментаторы, эксперты потешались над Ферран-Прево как только могли Лэнс Армстронг: «Я просто не верил своим глазам. Паулин олимпийская чемпионка, но ее аэродинамический профиль выглядел так, будто над велосипедом вообще никто не работал в аэротр

5🤨1

Signed Artyom Rubankov

5 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC105 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Словенская битва на «Вуэльте»: последний реальный шанс Роглича доказать, что он чего-то стоит? Итак, Погачар подтвердил поездку на «Вуэльту Испании» – чтобы добрать последний «Гранд-Тур» и сделать еще один шажочек в пантеон величайших. И, наверное, можно было представить, с какой яростью материлась предыдущая словенская суперзвезда Примож Роглич – он-то весь сезон нацелил в пятую победу на «Вуэльте», чтобы оформить

😁5🔥4

Signed Artyom Rubankov

5 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC105 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥31🤔1

Signed Artyom Rubankov

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lacasadetoma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TÖMAnotas || F1, вело, другие гонки и околоспорт” (@lacasadetoma), 290 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lacasadetoma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.