Channel
@labunskiy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
200subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001259219824 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @labunskiy |
| Description | Тут только личное мнение, домыслы, предположения и ничего больше. |
| Created | 6 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/labunskiy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 200 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 200 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 August 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
65 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 69.2% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 30.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2019 to 6 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @labunskiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2019 to 6 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Два года молчания. Обнаружил случайно, что два года сюда не писал. Нет, в запретограмм, к примеру, я не публиковал ничего три с половиной, одна фотка с пролетающим самолетом не в счет. Что изменилось за два года, кроме возраста? Восприятие мира. Не хочется никому ничего объяснять и доказывать. Зачем? Ради чего? Уверен человек в своей правоте - пожалуйста. Время всех рассудит, без моих соплей. Еще изменилось само …
❤41👍20
Если вы еще не читали свежего Диму Захарова, то почитайте. Нашел там молодого себя. Погрустил.
❤3
Откровенно жаль, что все мы (и многие другие) вынуждены пройти через эти события. Но вот уж чего мне точно не жаль, так это фейсбук и инстаграм. Жизнезаменители не заменят жизнь. Выйдите на улицу. Там сегодня солнце.
Вот уже несколько месяцев я заблочен в FB. Стала ли моя жизнь хуже? Нет. Стал ли я зарабатывать меньше денег? Нет. Я отписался от политических каналов. Меня не волнует, что там в очередной раз напишет какой-нибудь «советник», «общественник», «член общественной палаты» и прочие люди, существующие лишь виртуально. Некий набор публикаций. С реальными людьми все они ничего общего не имеют. Главная задача этих людей - бы…
Выпускали газету с пустой обложкой еще до того, как это стало мейнстримом
❤1
Сегодня, к сожалению, и оппозиция, и власть воспринимают СМИ как сервис, а не как продукт, который может существовать в своем собственном пространстве. Это, видимо, логика всех российских политиков: СМИ обязаны быть такими, какими хотят их видеть политики. Не верите? Попробуйте опубликовать интервью с любым политиком, любой политической ориентации, не согласовав его? Сразу нарветесь на крики, что «все вырвано из кон…
Поговорил с Димой Буевичем, похвалил ТВК, Борус, и Прокушева. Ну и попытался порассуждать о том, к каким чертям все катится. Сделайте трафика Городу Приме! https://gorodprima.ru/2020/10/29/ilya-labunskij/
Все совпадения случайны. Главная ошибка многих людей, пришедших к успеху - это навязчивое ощущение, что все кругом идиоты. А ты умный. Каюсь, сам грешен. На этом месте все и рушится. Не будьте как я.
Сегодня интернет это не только инструмент для мобилизации простеста, и инструмент для утилизации негатива. Написал в сети, пожаловался, и стало легче. Посмотрел видео, трансляции. Понял, что ты не один. И остался дома. Но стоит отобрать у человека такую возможность, то он отправляется искать справедливости на улице.
Ну и к печальным новостям: умер Евгений Адольфович Цветков. Можно к нему по-разному относиться, но фигурой для красноярской медиаотрасли был значимой. По ссылке интересное интервью 2008 года.
Попал в светскую хронику. А пить, да, перестал.
Илья Лабунский (собственник и издатель «Проспекта Мира») не только проехал на днях от Крыма до Москвы за рулем, но и решил подзавязать на неопределенный срок с алкоголем. Обоснование актуальное и экзотическое одновременно: пока мир не выйдет из нынешних передряг, надо воздерживаться. И ведь вряд ли это осторожность: зная продуктивную натуру Лабунского, это он так миру сделку предлагает, не иначе. @balddebut
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @labunskiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@labunskiy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тут был Лабунский” (@labunskiy), 200 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/labunskiy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.