8-8 不是有希望才去坚持 而是坚持了才有希望‼️ 只专注美卡抖音 专业批发‼️ 美全 1-9年 0违规/恢复 丝滑直登 一张纸的快乐‼️ 美卡全实名CK 1-9年老号 男女号 ‼️ 美卡 未实名 重启 掉实名 未改M/已改M 丝滑直登 ‼️ 认准888+转帐认准地址尾号 mmpS3J‼️ 关注小新不迷路‼️ t.me/labi8688 ‼️ 一个抖音翘起百万梦想!共赢热线 @skka8688

Channel
抖音优选-源头号商
@labi8688
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003981358146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @labi8688 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 21 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/labi8688 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 159 | +9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 150 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 147 | +18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 129 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 129 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 131 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.6%
- avg views ÷ 159 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 28.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 01s
- Average length
- 2m 01s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
出美卡 重启数据 未改M的 有需求来谈‼️ 出美卡 重启数据 未改M的 有需求来谈‼️ 出美卡 重启数据 未改M的 有需求来谈‼️
美全 0违规 百粉 缺货中 可以向客户推一下恢复百粉 千粉 大量现货 价钱给力 利润空间够大 一个抖音翘起百万梦想!共赢热线 @skka8688 ‼️‼️‼️
7-27 源头专业批发美卡 让你的飞机之旅更上一层楼‼️ 美全 1-9年 丝滑直登 一张纸的快乐‼️ 美半 1-9年 丝滑直登 价钱超级犀利‼️ 美卡全实名CK 1-9年老号 男女号 ‼️ 美卡 未实名 重启 掉实名 已改M 丝滑直登 ‼️ 认准888+转帐认准地址尾号 mmpS3J‼️ 关注小新不迷路‼️ t.me/labi8688 ‼️ 一个抖音翘起百万梦想!共赢热线 @skka8688
雷神CK一键登入 完整操作流程
7-19 源头专业批发美卡 让你的飞机之旅更上一层楼‼️ 大量出美卡禁言带密码数据 (已用过E卡商城)‼️ 大量出美卡禁言带密码数据 (已用过E卡商城)‼️ 大量出美卡禁言带密码数据 (已用过E卡商城)‼️ 认准888+转帐认准地址尾号 mmpS3J‼️ 关注小新不迷路‼️ t.me/labi8688 ‼️ 一个抖音翘起百万梦想!共赢热线 @skka8688
温馨提示 https://68sms.com 用这个平台的自己小心点 几百条数据 号码都提不出来 后面过软件 90%变新号!!!! 注意避坑!!!
更新日志: 修复获取验证码频繁
7-15 小新精选 专业批发美卡 让你的飞机之旅更上一层楼‼️ 美全 1-9年 丝滑直登 0违规 恢复 百千万粉通通现货‼️ 美卡全实名CK 1-9年老号 男女号 ‼️ 美卡 未实名 重启 掉实名 已改M 丝滑直登 ‼️ 持续张价中。。。。。。 认准888+转帐认准地址尾号 mmpS3J‼️ 关注小新不迷路‼️ t.me/labi8688 ‼️ 一个抖音翘起百万梦想!共赢热线 @skka8688
7-12 星光不问赶路人 时光不负有心人‼️ 美全 1-9年 丝滑直登 一张纸 挑战全场最低‼️ 美卡全实名CK 1-9年老号 男女号 ‼️ 美卡 未实名 重启 掉实名 已改M 丝滑直登 ‼️ 另长期收美卡实名 未实名数据 欢迎上量‼️ 认准888+转帐认准地址尾号 mmpS3J‼️ 关注小新不迷路‼️ t.me/labi8688 ‼️ 一个抖音翘起百万梦想!共赢热线 @skka8688
通知‼️‼️‼️ 7-11起 美全 0违规 恢复 直登号 全线价涨中。。。。‼️ 美未实名 掉实名 钱包实名 都可以直登的 全线价涨中‼️ 有需要的老板重新问价‼️‼️‼️
美全 恢复 5.3W粉 来个老板带走
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @labi8688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,317,774 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“抖音优选-源头号商” (@labi8688), 159 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/labi8688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.