Channel
@label423
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
67subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003015307354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @label423 |
| Description | Первый независимый белорусский лейбл с собственным ISRC Prefix Code BY-A0W Отзывы: https://t.me/review_423 Вопросы / релизы — сюда @prof_music1 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/label423 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 67 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 67 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,441 |
| Reactions total | 101 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
119 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 39.5% | |
| custom 5258099779254103915 | 21 | 17.6% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 17.6% | |
| 🆒 | 13 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5204190097079038236 | 9 | 7.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 5.88% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.84% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1. Как бы ты описал этот альбом? На альбоме я постарался выжать максимум из своих навыков, показать свой внутренний мир и лайфстайл. Но при этом понимаю, что мне ещё есть куда расти. 2. Откуда появилась идея сделать альбом? Идея появилась со временем, после выхода двух EP и множества синглов. Хотелось сделать этот год максимально продуктивным и оставить после него что-то масштабное. 3. Почему альбом называется #БОГ…
💯3
Важная информация по релизам и роялти❗️ Это касается артистов, которые работают с нами без договора Если артист приходит к нам с одним релизом исключительно для того, чтобы протестировать наш сервис и посмотреть, как всё работает, такой релиз мы будем выгружать не через 423 label, а через 423 distribution (обычная дистрибьюция). Если же артист действительно заинтересован в дальнейшем сотрудничестве с нами, он сообщ…
❤🔥3
НОВИНКИ @айдол - #БОГЕМА (album) ¡Gθ - iiii (album)
❤🔥4💯2🔥1
У нас хорошие новости: Meta (Instagram) потихоньку начала подгружать релизы. Если так пойдет дальше, в ближайшее время ожидаем доставки
НОВЫЙ ПОДПИСАНТ БАЛЛУ — сибирский рэп-артист, создающий музыку в стилях drill и хип-хоп. Его треки выделяются экспрессивным вокалом и мощными хуками, мгновенно захватывающими внимание. Тексты песен рассказывают о его жизни, дружбе и предательстве. Мрачные и атмосферные композиции БАЛЛУ точно найдут отклик в сердцах слушателей. Добро пожаловать)
ELAIZA поделилась сниппетом предстоящего трека «Чужие роли» 14.08.2026
❤4💯2
На нашем лейбле — три новых подписанта. Гликерия — сочетает эмоциональную лирику, яркие образы и современное звучание, рассказывая о любви, внутренних переживаниях, силе характера и поиске себя. HOODIE WIDE — артист, который передаёт эмоции через музыку. В своих треках он раскрывает темы отношений, внутренних переживаний, поиска себя и преодоления жизненных трудностей, сохраняя узнаваемый авторский стиль. ibeloved…
💯6❤3custom 52041900970790382363
Обновили договор. Мы внесли ряд изменений и переработали условия сотрудничества, чтобы сделать их более понятными, прозрачными и актуальными. Что изменилось? — пересмотрели отдельные условия взаимодействия; — уточнили ответственность сторон; — сделали структуру договора более логичной и удобной; — обновили некоторые условия сотрудничества с учетом нашего опыта и обратной связи от артистов. Без лишней бюрократии — до…
❤4
@айдол спалил треклист своего предстоящего альбома #БОГЕМА На фитах будут такие исполнители как… sh0uld ibeloved GIVEMEMORE, LUVSM, exwipe, kinky8, bloodedness, boguslav и тд… 07.08.2026
❤6custom 52041900970790382365💯4
НОВИНКА⭐ ALBUM: Newroaan-Dualist 423 label
💯3❤1custom 52041900970790382361
Мы заметили, что многие лейблы под видом своего продвижения выставляют кейсы уже успешных исполнителей, которые пришли к ним, заявляя: «благодаря нашему продвижению трек стал популярным». Хотя за этим успехом зачастую стоит сам артист, который месяцами самостоятельно форсил трек в TikTok, снимал ролики, работал с блогерами, вкладывал свое время и силы. Получается, что лейбл просто оказался рядом в нужный момент и поз…
❤6🆒2
👀 Смотрю, как всё больше лейблов ищут SMM-специалистов — от совсем небольших до крупных игроков вроде S&P Digital. И каждый раз задаюсь одним вопросом: ❓Неужели индустрия до сих пор не понимает, как действительно развивать артистов? Самое интересное, что почти каждый артист, который приходит к нам, первым делом спрашивает: 💬 «А у вас есть продвижение?» И это неудивительно. Годами лейблы продавали идею, что именно они…
❤4🆒2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @label423. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 276,480 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“423” (@label423), 67 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/label423.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.