Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 55 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Oct 2026, 05:21
106
-1
16 Sept 2026, 17:39
107
-4
22 Aug 2026, 23:23
111
+1
9 Aug 2026, 07:17
110
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:04
110
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5465213843980430762
18
24.7%
custom 5334567372697123794
16
21.9%
custom 5425018366043638595
9
12.3%
custom 5316509809766316011
8
11.0%
custom 5451835145407448401
7
9.59%
custom 5348195776373734757
4
5.48%
custom 5368676658637184797
4
5.48%
custom 5348350008649335036
3
4.11%
custom 5424752636417035046
3
4.11%
custom 5253649454401073265
1
1.37%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Надежный балдёжный тип привязанности: «Я достоин(а) любви, и ты тоже»
десерт на нашей познавательной кухне
человек с надежным типом привязанности спокойно воспринимает близость, не боится быть уязвимым и доверяет окружающим. Он уверен в себе и в своих отношениях. Он не скрывает свои чувства и потребности, потому что знает, что его не отвергнут.
для этого типа любовь — это не о страхе, а о доверии и взаимной поддерж…
Тревожно-избегающий тип привязанности или Дезорганизованный: «Уходи,нет, подожди, останься» хэппи хаус 🤡
человек с тревожно-избегающим типом привязанности хочет любви, но боится её. Одновременно стремится к близости и отталкивает партнёра, не позволяя себе полностью довериться. (такой парадокс на парадоксе)
⏺Как это проявляется
— отчаянно хотят любви, но когда её получают, начинают не доверять, обесценивать или убе…
Избегающий тип привязанности, сбегающий, убегающий: «Мне никто не нужен» (это не так )
продолжаем: человек с избегающим типом ценит свою независимость выше близости.
Он может любить, скучать и даже нуждаться в отношениях..
Но как только появляется настоящая эмоциональная близость — включается дистанция.
Внутри это работает так:
«Лучше держать людей на расстоянии, чем потом переживать боль».
⏺Как это проявляется
—…
Тревожный тип привязанности
решила начать с него и закончить надёжным, мы же стремимся к лучшему, правильно?)
короче, рассказываю: человек с тревожным типом оочень хочет близости, но при этом постоянно боится её потерять.
Поэтому внутри таких отношений часто живёт основная мысль:
«А вдруг меня разлюбят?»
⏺Как это проявляется
— постоянно ищут подтверждения любви
«а ты меня ТОЧНО любишь?»;
— слишком много мыслей об …
Сверяемся 📜
Напоминаю как считать баллы:
ответ "да" — 2 балла
"иногда" — 1 балл
"нет" — 0 баллов
Интерпретация баллов теста:
⏺0-5 баллов: Скорее всего, у вас надежный тип привязанности. Вам легко устанавливать доверительные и сбалансированные отношения, чувствуя себя комфортно в близости, но при этом не теряя независимость.
⏺6-10 баллов: Вы склонны к тревожному типу привязанности. Вам бывает трудно справляться с не…
⏺Легко ли вы переживаете разлуку или паузы в отношениях, чувствуя, что теряется эмоциональная связь?
Да25%
Иногда17%
Нет58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @la_kolpesse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⏺Бывает ли у вас желание постоянно проверять своего партнера, чтобы убедиться, что он или она не уходит?
Да17%
Иногда42%
Нет42%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 13 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“здоровая любовь в любом городе | Олеся К.” (@la_kolpesse), 106 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/la_kolpesse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
