Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for -

Channel

-

@l_Hyphen_l

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

368subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002959572397
TypeChannel
Username@l_Hyphen_l
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/l_Hyphen_l

Growth

368375371.59 August 2026 — 375 subscribers10 August 2026 — 374 subscribers17 August 2026 — 368 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 367–376 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:04368-6
10 Aug 2026, 11:37374-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:31375first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 368 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (2 August 20264 August 2026)
Views total983
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC57 viewsread 9 August 2026

-تمّت السلسلة، ولله الحمد- وكما ذكرنا في الرسالة الأولى منها أن أكثرها مأخوذ بشيئ من الاختصار والتصرف من : -أجوبة القراء الفضلاء لشيخنا المحقق إيهاب فكري حيدر، أدام الله نفعه.

4 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC51 viewsread 9 August 2026

ومنها : إِعظامُ أجورٍ هذه الأمةِ من حيث إنهم يُفْرّغون جهدَهم ليَبلغوا قصدَهم في تتبُّع معاني ذلك، واستنباطِ الحِكَم والأحكامِ من دلالة كلِّ لفظٍ، واستخراجِ كمينِ أسرارِه،وخفيِّ إشاراتِه، وإنعامِهم النظرَ وإمعانِهم الكشفَ عن التوجيه والتعليل والترجيح والتفصيل بقدر ما يَبلغ غايةُ علمِهم، ويصل إليه نهايةُ فهمٍهم {فاستجابَ لهم ربهم أنِّي لا أُضيعُ عملَ عاملٍ منكم مّن ذكرٍ أو أُنثَى}. ومنها : بيانُ فضلِ هذه الأمةِ وشرفِ

4 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026

لماذا نتعلم القراءات (٢١) قال الإمام ابن الجزري في فوائد علم القراءات من كتاب " النشر " ( ج 1/ص 52 ) : "وأما فائدةُ اختلافِ القراءات وتنوعِها فإن في ذلك فوائد غير ما قدمنا من سبب التهوين والتسهيل والتخفيف على الأمة، ومنها: ما في ذلك من نهايةِ البلاغة، وكمالِ الإعجاز وغايةِ الاختصار وجمالِ الإيجاز ،إذ كلُّ قراءةٍ بمنزلة الآيةِ، إذ كان تنوُّعُ اللفظ بكلمةٍ تقوم مقامَ آياتٍ.. ولو جُعٍلتْ دلالةُ كل لفظٍ آية على حدتها ل

4 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC34 viewsread 9 August 2026

لماذا نتعلم القراءات (٢٠) اعلم أن طالبَ العلم يُستحَب له حفظ القرآن قبل بدء طلب العلم، كما نص علي ذلك الأوزاعي والنووي وابن تيمية-رحمة الله عليهم- أما طالبُ علمِ القراءات فإن حفْظَ القرآن واجبٌ عليه، لأنه لا يستطيع تعلُّمَ هذا العلمِ إلا وهو حافظٌ للقرآنِ بإحدى القراءات أو الروايات.. فمن بركةِ هذا العلم أنه إن حُفٍظ، فهو نافعٌ، وإن أُُنسِي، أبقَى لك حفْظَ القرآن.. ولك أن تعجَّبَ من مدى نفعٍ هذا العلم حال حفظه وحال

4 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026

لماذا نتعلم القراءات (١٩) لا يخفَى على أحدٍ ما أصاب هذا العلمَ من غربةٍ، خاصةً في زماننا هذا، بل قبلَه بأزمنةٍ طويلة.. فقد قال الحافظ ابن الجزري في كتاب النشر ( ج 1/ص 54 ) : "وإنّي لما رأيتُ الهممَ قد قصُرت، ومعالِمَ هذا العلمِ الشريف قد دثَرت، وخَلَت من أئمتِه الآفاق ... " فإنَّ كان هذا الكلامَ قد قيل منذ مايقربُ من سِتِّ مائةِ سنةٍ.. فما بالُك بما آلَ إليه الحال الآن ؟!! ️لقد بلغت غربةُ هذا العلمِ أن صدرت الفتاوى

4 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026

لماذا نتعلم القراءات (١٨) العلومُ الشرعية متنوعةٌ، وأغلبُها يحتاج إلى ملكات الحفظِ وقوةِ الفهم والذكاء.. وقد جمع علمُ القراءات هاتين الخصلتين، لكنّ أغلبَه مما يستطيعه الحفظة، مما لا يُشترَط فيهم قوةُ الذكاء والاستنباط، وأقلُّه يحتاج إلى الفقهِ والاستنباط.. لأنّ مجالَ الاجتهاد فيه ضيق، فأغلبُه علمٌ نقليّ.. وهو من هذا الجهة يصلح لجمهور المسلمين، فكلٌّ منهم يستطيع أن يأخذَ منه ما يناسبه، ابتداءً بالمفترَض عليه، وهو ح

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @l_Hyphen_l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,108,034 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-” (@l_Hyphen_l), 368 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/l_Hyphen_l.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.