Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kyousey Ioko | Cosplay

@kyouseyioko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

179subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001606742414
TypeChannel
Username@kyouseyioko
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kyouseyioko

Growth

179180179.59 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 180 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:30 — 180 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:31 — 179 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:1710 Aug 2026, 09:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 179–180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:31179-1
9 Aug 2026, 19:30180no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:17180first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.7%
avg views ÷ 179 subscribers
Avg views / post
137
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held8 (29 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total824
Reactions total184
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

218 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54048561961233572967132.6%
custom 54043345293955853855625.7%
custom 52425239729809775373013.8%
custom 53148097199766337852913.3%
custom 5337014705191929811135.96%
custom 5337164427751867916115.05%
custom 545836545420244890283.67%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kyouseyioko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC42 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ENA: Dream BBQ Coral glasses Ещё один древний закосик, я прям, ну как всегда, вовремя

custom 540485619612335729612custom 52425239729809775377custom 54583654542024489027

6 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC70 views44 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Моя маленькая лошадь🥺 Случился глупый закосик на Эплджек из того, что было под рукой - а под рукой было примерно нихуя ⭐️Планирую выложить другие "нормальные" фотки, но случился переезд, потом работа, потом откис

custom 531480971997663378520custom 524252397298097753713custom 54043345293955853859custom 53370147051919298111custom 53371644277518679161

19 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC187 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Человек забывший покушать едет вновь😒 В будущем буду стричь чёлку короче и немного переуложу, меня не совсем устраивает результат, но мейк хороший

custom 540485619612335729622custom 53148097199766337856custom 53371644277518679163

18 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC172 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @krussy6Photo

Почти иден

custom 540433452939558538521

18 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC185 views35 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Еду жеско🤩

custom 540485619612335729619custom 54043345293955853859custom 52425239729809775376custom 53148097199766337851

16 Jul 2026, 23:28 UTC168 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

АНОНС АНИКОН Two days - two bitches Буду 18 числа – в образе Хатсуне Мику 🌸 19 числа – Юки Цукумо 💋 По большей части анонс получается для друзьяшек/знакомых👍 Буду очень рада встретиться со всеми!🌟 Лучше поздно, чем никогда (я работаль😥)

custom 540433452939558538513custom 53370147051919298118custom 53371644277518679165custom 54583654542024489021

29 Jun 2026, 18:49 UTC212 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

В какой день планируйте посетить Аникон? Если планируете🌟

  1. 1764%
  2. 1879%
  3. 1979%
  4. Я ещё и выступающий!🥴57%

The shares total 279%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 53370147051919298114custom 54043345293955853853custom 53371644277518679162

29 Jun 2026, 18:48 UTC192 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤔Появилась мысль посетить Аникон, но не уверенна в какой день лучше пойти! 😒 Устраиваю опрос! 🌟 да, я обожаю опросы Мой образ гяру не свежей первости! Спойлер, буду переделывать⭐️

custom 540485619612335729618custom 52425239729809775374custom 53148097199766337852custom 54043345293955853851

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @kyouseyioko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jun 2026, 18:49 UTCFinal Results14 voters

В какой день планируйте посетить Аникон? Если планируете🌟

  1. 1764%
  2. 1879%
  3. 1979%
  4. Я ещё и выступающий!🥴57%

The shares total 279%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 793,898 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kyousey Ioko | Cosplay” (@kyouseyioko), 179 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kyouseyioko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.