Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💯海浪の南部精選班表

Channel

💯海浪の南部精選班表

@ky899yp88

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

476subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002068376921
TypeChannel
Username@ky899yp88
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ky899yp88

Growth

473476474.57 August 2026 — 473 subscribers8 August 2026 — 473 subscribers16 August 2026 — 475 subscribers24 August 2026 — 476 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 473–476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 13:06476+1
16 Aug 2026, 03:15475+2
8 Aug 2026, 04:45473no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:34473first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.36%
avg views ÷ 476 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.3
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held8 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total90
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ky899yp21Photo

女上位的時候 奶在晃 腿在夾 完全不知道眼睛該看哪 秋天的第一炮被安排的明明白白的 🍀 星柔實拍圖點擊🉑查看 「#高雄可約 」 👇 「#高雄客評」 💝今天約ㄉ妹妹:星柔 🏠地區:高雄 ▪️妹妹身材:高挑、身材比例很好 ▪️長相顏值:氣質御姐臉、五官精緻、高級感很強,看起來很有女人味 ▪️整體服務:主動、配合度高、情緒價值很好 ▪️回沖率:高 *┄┅┄┅┄┅┄┅┄┄┅┄┅┄┅┄* ❤️服務過程:進房後第一眼就被氣質吸住,高挑的身材加上御姐氣場,完全是尤物等級。洗澡很仔細,過程自然不尷尬,會主動引導。正式開始後配合度很高,不趕時間,女上位很有感覺,整場氣氛都維持得很好。聊天也很舒服,有被好好對待的感覺,結束後還意猶未盡 👧對海浪的評價:海浪安排的都還不錯,大家可以完全相信海浪,不會失望 🍻 預約直接私訊海浪⬇️ 🈺10:00-03:00 💘 TG:@ky899yp 📱 L𝐼𝑁𝐸:k54568 ⭐ G𝑙𝑒𝑒𝑧𝑦:k54568

7 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hailang889

秋天的第一杯奶茶都知道喝 那秋天的第一炮你們都打了嗎🤣

7 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ky899yp21Photo

🎂 海浪生日福利正式進入倒數! 現在搭配更划算 整體方案也更加超值✨ 這次主打的是「折扣價 不折扣品質」!

7 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ky899yp21Photo

每一位朋友的需求與喜好 海浪都會認真記在心裡🤍 不論是第一次接觸 還是一路配合了好幾年的老朋友 只要願意把信任交給海浪 我就會一直用心對待

6 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ky899yp21Photo

🌊海浪生日月正式開跑‼️ 一年一次的生日限定回饋 這波福利真的比平常更有誠意 ⏰ 限時 8/1-8/13 名額有限 先約先享受 💌 想了解活動內容 直接看圖片 或私訊海浪 @ky899yp

6 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ky899yp21Photo

🇹🇼 南部可約 今日主推 🤩「150小隻馬直接融化」 🤩 昕蓉 150-B-40-18歲 才150卻意外有料 抱起來剛好可以整個人圈住 白色套裝穿起來甜到不行 膝蓋跪著的姿勢超乖 小隻馬身形 被抱住時會整個人縮在你懷裡 🍻 預約直接私訊海浪⬇️ 🈺10:00-03:00 💘 TG:@ky899yp 📱 L𝐼𝑁𝐸:k54568 ⭐ G𝑙𝑒𝑒𝑧𝑦:k54568 ⭐ G𝑙𝑒𝑒𝑧𝑦:hailang0813

6 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ky899yp21Photo

🇹🇼 南部可約 今日主推 🤩「鄰家女孩直接心動」 🤩 禾晴 160-D-45-23歲 看起來就像住在隔壁的普通女孩 親和力超高 黑上衣簡單卻很修身 整個人給人很舒服的感覺 鄰家型氣質 聊天自然不做作 🍻 預約直接私訊海浪⬇️ 🈺10:00-03:00 💘 TG:@ky899yp 📱 L𝐼𝑁𝐸:k54568 ⭐ G𝑙𝑒𝑒𝑧𝑦:k54568 ⭐ G𝑙𝑒𝑒𝑧𝑦:hailang0813

4 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ky899yp21Photo

香港大大來台灣旅遊 校花思婷三節約上😍

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ky899yp88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 744,556 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💯海浪の南部精選班表” (@ky899yp88), 476 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ky899yp88.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.