Channel
@kxcgpd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
701subscribers
-73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003476298595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kxcgpd |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kxcgpd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 701 | -72 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 773 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 773 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:19 | 774 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 94 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🍏🍎🍐🍊🍋🍋🟩🍌🍉 😍尊享会员礼遇，逢8日现金惊喜如期而至。以实力铸就口碑，以信誉守护安心，稳定保障每一份投入。彩金加持，让成功更进一步！ 累计存款 88+ 即领5🌶 累计存款 188+ 即领8🌶 累计存款 2888+ 即领28🌶 累计存款 8888+ 即领58🌶 累计存款12888+ 即领88🌶 累计存款 58888+ 即领188🌶 😍最高可得8888现金大礼😍 🎉在凯旋，不只是参与，更是稳步前行；不只是期待，而是看得见的回报。 🌐PG电子反水1.3%起，每日6波红包雨，未赌先赢！ 🩷❤️🧡💛💚🩵💙💜🖤🩶
男子因乘客长时间打电话发生争吵，列车长一句“群众斗群众”直接点燃怒火
现在到处都是监控，居然还敢讹人！有时候扶老人还真需要勇气
重庆古城区街道小酒吧的松弛感！ 网友：她们是不是被上海拒签了？
女子吐槽14万买的钻石项链，现在想卖，200元都不值！！好奇现在情侣结婚还买钻石吗？
有这买鱼放生的功夫，还不如把钱捐给有需要的人！
女孩跟团找向导攀登萨武神山，因未能登顶心生不爽，发文网暴该俱乐部！ 俱乐部放出证据：女子出现高反下撤，并安排人员陪同就医，报名费用也进行了退款！目前女孩评论区翻车
真的有人会买吗？🤔
近期网友拍摄到的吊牌侠，怎么有勇气穿出来的
上帝之手，及时止损～
以前家长遛娃占篮球场，现在变成家长遛狗了！
#投稿，山东28岁母教师因为男友在家楼下抽电子烟发飙，回家后拿刀捅死男友，被法院判处死刑。评论区的仙女们又发力了💩💩💩 #仙女美丽时刻
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kxcgpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 498,852 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“开心吃瓜-东南亚 KX.TOP 独家赞助” (@kxcgpd), 701 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kxcgpd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.