A Pepes Dream is being protected by @SafeguardRobot Click below to verify you're human

Channel
KWEENS KALLS 👑
@kweenskalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
34subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001989820406 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kweenskalls |
| Created | 30 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kweenskalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 34 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 36 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 30 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 63.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2023 to 10 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sorry for time rug. Call incoming in few days ❤️
😨2🤨1
In few hours! Low mcap
❤6🔥3
Call tomorrow ❤️ 🖨
❤3🐳2
HAVE NEW ONE PARTNERSHIP. ITS WOULD BE BIG. ❤️ 👧
❤3
Swirl team doing their thing while everyone else is getting rugged on these pnds. Look for dips into these solid projects, cause these are the projects you’ll comfortably sleep on at night. Just announced their most recent news 👇🏼 https://twitter.com/voltinuofficial/status/1650872472093196288?s=46&t=UZNPdv1lKFB11uxxukAygA
❤4🤡2
CZpepe This BSC token is mixing CZ and Pepe. An ETH team doing Bsc they say will push. 37k mcap Worth the gamble! https://t.me/czpbsc https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x50b362da8b1cd3a2fba3a37ad3761d5c3f521315
❤1
Bahamas $BAMA Aped this 0/0 tax play. Mcap : 60k Burnt Lp https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xf5e29a486a3247b8db9b136af80cd2d05b26a3f0 https://t.me/bahamastokeneth
KWEENS KALLS 👑 pinned a photo
$oFLOKI Optimism tokens are new meta on BSC and @OptimismFloki smashed a new ATH earlier, but in a dip atm .. could be a nice entry here. Cmc & CG have been applied for. 139k MC Locked & Renounced 💰 Juicy $FLOKI rewards 💎 Based team https://www.dextools.io/app/en/bnb/pair-explorer/0x2c305efb201998416f80ec20df5307682ffae052 t.me/Optimism_Floki
Print the bob looks like there are two $PB (Print the bob) one had a big presale & the one (below)stealth launched. Verified & locked now, plus the marketing funds are sent straight to deployer of $BOB. This one: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xfEF65fD06880e92B6C7CB902dC8A9400b480e2ff Might be a good one to watch. If Bob keeps running, could do what $PP (print the Pepe) is doing - ATH 6million…
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kweenskalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,339,454 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kweenskalls named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KWEENS KALLS 👑” (@kweenskalls), 34 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kweenskalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.