Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

kvitsumi

@kvitsumi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

597subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001790833551
TypeChannel
Username@kvitsumi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kvitsumi

Growth

597598597.57 Aug 2026, 07:17 — 598 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:01 — 597 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:178 Aug 2026, 06:01
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 597–598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:01597-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:17598first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.0%
avg views ÷ 597 subscribers
Avg views / post
334
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held14 (20 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total4,347
Reactions total805
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

805 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
37446.5%
custom 546092411654455056310613.2%
custom 5296307773959587751577.08%
custom 5460707757567014784577.08%
custom 5460927170266297274526.46%
🐳415.09%
💋283.48%
🍌212.61%
🎉192.36%
❤‍🔥121.49%
🙏111.37%
💘101.24%
🕊70.87%
🔥40.497%
💔30.373%
🍓20.248%
😭10.124%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 805reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kvitsumi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC166 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🐳125🍌1💔1

4 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC135 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AMA_DEDPhoto

МАМА ВАЙ МИ МАМА МАМА ВАЙ МИ Наскетчл неповторимого

🐳236custom 52963077739595877514💋3custom 54609241165445505633❤‍🔥1🍌1💔1

3 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC221 views86 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

как оказалось у меня на работе есть коворкер ванписфаг поэтому я ему сегодня на огрызке бумаги нарисовал луффи (я не умею рисовать на бумаге)

custom 54609241165445505635120🙏7custom 54609271702662972743🍌1🐳1🔥1🕊1

2 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC187 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AMA_DEDPhoto

ОППААА Я если честно был бы рад репостикам😊 Ну немножко

custom 5460707757567014784268💋3custom 54609241165445505632🍌1💔1😭1custom 52963077739595877511

2 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC264 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а это то что я на превью атак поставил азазазза

custom 5460927170266297274446💘6💋3🍌1

1 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC252 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

теперь полноценок не будет ещё год, всем спасибо 🤷‍♂️

custom 5460924116544550563173🍌1

1 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC327 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

последний

42custom 52963077739595877519custom 54609241165445505637custom 54607077575670147845🕊2🍌1🎉1💋1

1 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC303 views90 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

второй пошел

53custom 529630777395958775112custom 546070775756701478412custom 54609241165445505637💘2🍌1🐳1💋1

1 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC308 views92 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

до артфайта меньше суток я опомнился только щас поэтому взлетаем атаковал её

59custom 529630777395958775114custom 54609241165445505639custom 54607077575670147845🐳2🍌1💘1🕊1

29 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC413 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kabKABI17Photo

С отцом

39❤‍🔥9💋6custom 52963077739595877513🍌1🙏1custom 54607077575670147841

28 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC451 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

я опять постригся и снова не понимаю как рисовать свою прическу новую (а ещё мне надо научиться ее укладывать)

68🎉18🍌11custom 54607077575670147846💋3🙏1custom 54609241165445505631custom 54609271702662972741

24 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC633 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

обнова авы потому что мне слишком понравился этот арт ☺️ автор: https://artfight.net/~Chepa26 (атаковали на артфайте)

16💋6🔥3🍓1🕊1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kvitsumi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 165,908 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kvitsumi” (@kvitsumi), 597 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kvitsumi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.