Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Миша пишет про презентации в PowerPoint

Channel

Миша пишет про презентации в PowerPoint

@kuzmisha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,941subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001558736454
TypeChannel
Username@kuzmisha
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kuzmisha

Growth

5,9265,9415,933.57 August 2026 — 5,933 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,933 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,929 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,926 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,928 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,927 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,936 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,941 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 15 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,924–5,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 20:185,941+5
19 Aug 2026, 20:335,936+9
16 Aug 2026, 19:485,927-1
13 Aug 2026, 12:285,928+2
10 Aug 2026, 12:215,926-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:035,929-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:015,933no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:585,933first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 5,941 subscribers
Avg views / post
899
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (21 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total11,686
Reactions total419
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 55s
Average length
5m 28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

550 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30455.3%
👍11621.1%
8415.3%
💩183.27%
😁183.27%
🤔50.909%
😱40.727%
👎10.182%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 550reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kuzmisha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC434 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Забирайте бесплатный шаблон! В продолжение щепки про шейдеры, принесла вам шаблон анимации в pptx. с похожим фоном слайдов. Анимация реализована с помощью перехода «Трансформация» и анимации вылета. Как сделать такой фон, смотрите в этой щепке. Итоговый слайд с анимацией прикреплен к этому посту. Вы можете забрать его шаблон в pptx и шрифты по ссылке Дизайном вдохновились у Арины

🔥18👍63

10 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC534 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Теперь мои эмоции от вайб-интенсива. И где я облажался :) Этот интенсив я сделал в формате игры. Это моя первая игра! Получился не набор уроков, а полноценный сюжет на шесть модулей. Детектив против Рокона! С персонажами, которые росли и менялись. С антагонистами, сражениями и драмой. Нас сажали в тюрьму, мы защищали продукт перед стейкхолдерами, боролись с перфекционизмом и вернули интернет городу. Я делал эту игр

🔥14👍73😁2

10 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC558 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ими гордится школа Смотрите, что сделали ребята на курсе по Вайб-кодингу. Мы провели шикарные две недели в разработке и с потрясающей группой студентов. Две недели назад большинство из них не знали, что такое Claude Code и Codex. Это и не помешало реализовать очень смелые и сложные идеи. И это намного больше, чем просто презентации. Вайб-кодинг открывает невероятные возможности. Хвастаюсь работами лишь части ребят,

🔥248👍3👎1

9 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC635 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Эксперименты с шейдерами Обещала снять щепку. В видео показала сразу два типа шейдеров — как заливка фона и как эффект. Как вам такие обновления. Уже экспериментировали с новыми настройками? Дизайном вдохновились у Арины

🔥22👍4

8 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC725 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А как вы понимаете, что неделя была очень нагружена? 😀

😁152

7 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC829 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вопрос скользкий, давайте подумаем вместе! Представьте: я за вечер генерирую пакет из 100 иллюстраций в едином стиле, специально под презентации. Красивые, аккуратные, все в одном стиле. В качестве референсов беру картинки с Pinterest. А потом ставлю этот пакет на продажу Технически это делается не сложно. Но есть два вопроса: 1. А нормально ли так вообще? 2. Кто-то готов вообще за это платить? С одной стороны, э

👍38💩18🔥13

7 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC811 views40 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кое-что для вас собрал. Привет, бандиты! C Claude Code получилось сделать задачку, которую не мог решить два года. Пару лет назад мы ввели рубрику «словарь дизайнера» Рубрика была полезная, но посты улетали вверх и оставались в истории канала. Понятно, что рубрику нужно переносить на сайт. Но как её сделать интересной? Читать статьи это максимально скучно. Решение: делать интерактивный лонггриды. Чуть-чуть почита

🔥29👍74

4 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,090 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Figma motion — новый инструмент анимации Для эксперимента я сделала несколько анимаций, и вот что могу рассказать про эту функцию 👇 Motion — анимация завязанная на ключевых точках. Если вы когда-то работали таким типом анимации или монтажа, быстро разберетесь. Анимировать можно много разных параметров: положение объекта, размеры и форму, изменение цвета и прозрачности, скругления углов. 🔥 Самое классное, все это

🔥185😁1

1 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈1,210 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У меня появился велосипед, который старше меня. Я давно мечтал о ретро шоссейнике. Последние полгода периодически проверял Авито на подходящие объявления. И вот в июле наткнулся на этот прекрасный ХВЗ Турист, примерно восьмидесятых годов производства. Отлично и педантично восстановленный, с родными тормозами и скоростями. Всё. Пойду погоняю

🔥43👍94

29 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,310 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пытался сегодня написать пост: с чем в дизайне нейросеть справляется плохо? думал и понял, что уже, наверное, почти ни с чем. Косяки, конечно, есть, но в основном на первых итерациях. Однотипные макеты. Иногда ломается единая сетка. ИИ часто набивает экран под завязку и лишает его воздуха. Пытается влепить везде дурацкие коллонтитулы. Но всё это лечится. Пара скриншотов, пара комментариев, несколько правок, и проб

👍8🤔5😱43

28 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,200 views38 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Шрифты для длинных заголовков Узкие гротески отлично смотрятся на слайде в качестве заголовков. На случай, если от Bebas Neue уже тошнит, собрали для вас подборку из 5 шрифтов. ✔️ Лицензия: все шрифты из подборки можно использовать в личных и коммерческих целях. Забрать все шрифты можно на диске

🔥353

27 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,210 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Начали сегодня интенсив «Старт в вайб-кодинге»! Для меня это эксперимент: упаковать онлайн-курс в игру. Мы продолжаем ту бесплатную часть, которую многие из вас прошли. Проживаем жизнь детектива в городе. Только теперь он получил силу вайб-кодинга, но её нужно раскачать. Детектив общается с жителями города, решает задачки и всё больше и больше узнаёт про вайб-кодинг. И сегодня последний день, когда к нам можно пр

🔥112

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kuzmisha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@kuzmisha edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 579,233 of 1,585,759entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЭКСЕЛЬХАК
@excelhackru · 73,729
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Миша пишет про презентации в PowerPoint” (@kuzmisha), 5,941 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuzmisha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.