Channel
@kusao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002748755377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kusao |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 19 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kusao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 28 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 27 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 27 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 19 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 25 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
这种骗子都是先骗人拉群 然后不说话 你发了他就假装对接 等半夜了 改群名 冒充对方的人来行骗 打钱 防不胜防 账号类型：骗子 账号 ID：8438247698 姓名：旧金山（日量千万 长期收一手通道） 用户名：@bcpkou 手机号：88809670967 会员：⭐️已开通 状态：刚刚在线 账号类型：骗子 账号 ID：7999888888 姓名：天启 用户名：@tqi0044 会员：⭐️已开通 状态：刚刚在线
❤1
BYD支付 行星支付 创达支付 三个户一家公司的 打完预付就切停 喊他开启说台风来停电了 喊他清预付 一直拖着说财务没来 跑路6w多 据我所知已有多个同行还被他欠着钱 现在还在找人清预付 卡到就是赚到 👤 8452210405 👦🏻 行星支付-太阳 🌐 @XXZF886 🕑 已更新 23/09/2025 👤 7539830429 👦🏻 行星支付- 👪 水星 🌐 @xxzf0003 🕑 已更新 19/09/2025 👤 6656291773 👦🏻 创达支付 / 啊宝 打款需两人确认 🌐 @CD_aB11 🕑 已更新 22/09/2025 👤 7869449704 👦🏻 创达支付 - 玲儿 下发需2人验证 🌐 @CD_Ler 🕑 已更新 23/09/2025 👤 8248484553 👦🏻 BYD支付-唐 认准+888唯一账号 🌐 @BYD8866 🕑 已更新 22/09/2025 👤 7987263275 👦🏻 B…
承兑收话费款，开始说是安全发风控一个月，等了一个月，又说没解开，需要提交资料，后来直接不回消息，现在地址每天都在用 骗子地址：TNc9Xd9Kgzwoh8EUDA2mHWwACws9uay335 @YuanBao913 @xingchen63 👤 7840205774 👦🏻 星 👪 仔 🌐 @xingxing1234321 🇨🇳 Chinese 🕑 已更新 27/08/2025 👤 7093369669 👦🏻 阿乐 🌐 @YuanBao913 🕑 已更新 24/06/2025 👤 6452801458 👦🏻 星 👪 辰 🌐 @xingchen63 🕑 已更新 17/09/2025
活不起的玩意 早上11点多准备清账 手下人后台没关通道 没注意跑超了8千多块钱 现在已读不回 有合作的还没清的直接卡就完事儿了 卡到就是赚到 👤 7914702777 👦🏻 明城(运营） 🌐 @mincheng123 🕑 已更新 03/09/2025 👤 7943235686 👦🏻 Diva ❤️ 👪 (Kustyaningsih) 🌐 @divakustyanigsih 🕑 已更新 24/07/2025 👤 7531153548 👦🏻 谈好价格 🌐 @jhgujyty 🕑 已更新 19/09/2025
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @kusao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 862,284 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kusao named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“宝达担保 曝光频道 @bddb” (@kusao), 28 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kusao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.