3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 604–605 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 03:57
604
-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:45
605
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:39
605
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 13 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4188.7%
avg views ÷ 604 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,300
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.119%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
10 (13 August 2024 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
25,300
Reactions total
30
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
124
56.6%
👍
44
20.1%
🙏
35
16.0%
🔥
10
4.57%
🥰
5
2.28%
😢
1
0.457%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2024 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💛Сегодня команда «Курс Одесса» вместе с неравнодушными людьми посетила детский дом в селе Николаевка Одесской области.
Мы привезли детям сладости, мячи, самолётики, игрушки, одежду, обувь, футболки и много других подарков. Но самое главное — провели этот день вместе: играли, общались и подарили друг другу искренние эмоции.
Спасибо всем, кто был с нами. Если вы тоже хотите делать добрые дела — присоединяйтесь к благ…
📌Дорогие подписчики!
Публикую обещанный пост с отчетностью по сбору средств в поддержку директора Одесского зоопарка.
Всего за одни сутки вы собрали 88 695 грн!
Прикладываю скриншоты собранной суммы и перевода — все средства были отправлены на карту жены Игоря Белякова. Мы приняли такое решение, чтобы максимально быстро и удобно передать помощь, не отвлекая самого Игоря Владимировича на встречи и съёмки — сейчас у н…
🐾По вашей просьбе и по результатам опроса открыт сбор средств в поддержку директора Одесского зоопарка Игоря Белякова. Все средства будут переданы ему для восстановления утраченного имущества и решения первоочередных бытовых нужд.
UPD: Сбор закрыт, собранно 88 695 грн.
Курсовчане | Курс Одесса
💛5 мая команда «Курс Одесса» навестила ветерана Валентину Даниловну, которой исполнилось 95 лет, и поздравила её с днём рождения и с приближающимся Днём Победы. Вместе с тёплыми словами привезли продукты и цветы.🌸
Курсовчане | Курс Одесса
👼Вчера мы вместе с нашими друзьями навестили детский дом. Это был тёплый и наполненный эмоциями день. ❤️ Как всё прошло — смотрите в нашем видео
🔗Посилання на банку
Курсовчане | Курс Одесса
Допомога дітям ❤️🩹
Допомога дитячому будинку для діток від 0 до 7 років ❤️🩹 73 дитини, з них більше 10 діток з особливостями, які нажаль навіть харчуються медикаментозно. Для закупівлі: сумішей, каш, памперсів, фоуктів і трощки смаколиків і іграшок. Поїдемо через 2 тижні
🔗Посилання на банку
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/5S92NGatKv
💳Номер картки банки
4441 1111 2398 6717
Курсовчане | Курс Одесса
💛Сегодня, 17 октября, Благотворительный фонд «Курс Одесса» раздал 80 наборов продуктов среди старших жителей Одессы.
🏦Посилання на банку:
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/7kwZaygeuw
Курсовчане | Курс Одесса
😇 Помните историю, когда во время одного из прилетов в Одессе пострадала и полностью выгорела квартира Маргариты Семеновны? Мы проводили сбор средств и, как и обещали, сейчас готовы показать вам результат. Чтобы не тратить лишние слова, просто посмотрите видео до конца. 🎥 Хочется искренне поблагодарить всех, кто помог восстановить жилье этой женщине. 🙏
Из городского бюджета Маргарите удалось получить новые окна и дв…
💛Сегодня, 13 августа, Благотворительный фонд «Курс Одесса» раздал 55 наборов продуктов среди старших жителей Одессы.
🏦Посилання на банку:
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/7kwZaygeuw
Курсовчане | Курс Одесса
❤11👍4🙏3🥰2😢1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kursovchane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 568,016 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kursovchane named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@arslanoff_odessa named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dmitriev_group named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@pantuk_viktor named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Курсовчане 💛” (@kursovchane), 604 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kursovchane.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
